Literature DB >> 24917704

Demographics of Men Receiving Vasectomies in the US Military 2000-2009.

Michael Santomauro1, James Masterson1, Charles Marguet1, Donald Crain1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesize that there is a higher incidence of vasectomy within the military at a younger age based on this equal access health care system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the CHAMPS military database was conducted for men receiving vasectomies from 2000 to 2009. Age at vasectomy, number of children, race, religion, and marital status were recorded and incidence was computed.
RESULTS: Total of 82,945 vasectomies was performed. The overall incidence to have a vasectomy was approximately 7.10 per 1000 men. The highest rate of occurrence was 14.4 per 1000 men in men 30-34 years old. Whites had a higher rate than blacks at 10.03 per 1000 men compared to 6.27 per 1000 men. Protestants had the highest rate at 8.44 per 1000 men, and Jewish people had the lowest at 1.86 per 1000 men. Married men had a rate of 12.3 per 1000 men, whereas single men were 1.03 per 1000 men.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence to have a vasectomy in the military was 7.10 per 1000 men, with an age adjusted rate at 8.66 per 1000 men. This information may assist primary care providers in discussing vasectomies as a permanent form of contraception.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sterilization; US Military; Vasectomy

Year:  2012        PMID: 24917704      PMCID: PMC3783337          DOI: 10.1159/000338863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol        ISSN: 1661-7649


  6 in total

1.  Characteristics of men receiving vasectomies in the United States, 1998-1999.

Authors:  Mark A Barone; Christopher H Johnson; Melanie A Luick; Daria L Teutonico; Robert J Magnani
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

Review 2.  No-scalpel, no-needle vasectomy.

Authors:  Mara A Monoski; Philip S Li; Neil Baum; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Vasectomy in the United States, 2002.

Authors:  Mark A Barone; Paul L Hutchinson; Christopher H Johnson; Jason Hsia; Jennifer Wheeler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Demographics of vasectomy--USA and international.

Authors:  John M Pile; Mark A Barone
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  "Dr. Sharp with his little knife": therapeutic and punitive origins of eugenic vasectomy--Indiana, 1892-1921.

Authors:  A Gugliotta
Journal:  J Hist Med Allied Sci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.088

6.  Racial differences in vasectomy utilization in the United States: data from the national survey of family growth.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Jillian T Henderson; John K Amory; James F Smith; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 2.649

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  CUA guideline: Vasectomy.

Authors:  Armand Zini; John Grantmyre; Peter Chan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Attitudes towards vasectomy and its acceptance as a method of contraception among clinical-year medical students in a Malaysian private medical college.

Authors:  Saw Ohn Mar; Osman Ali; Sugathan Sandheep; Zul Husayni; Muhammad Zuhri
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 1.858

3.  UPDATE - 2022 Canadian Urological Association best practice report: Vasectomy.

Authors:  Armand Zini; John Grantmyre; Victor Chow; Peter Chan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.052

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.