BACKGROUND: There are an estimated 6,900 people with HIV living in Ireland. There is a significant prevalence of femoral osteonecrosis and risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. With this potential, increasing surgical workload, it is important to assess surgical demand and audit outcomes. METHODS: The hospital's electronic records were examined. Between January 2005 and August 2011, 17 femoral surgeries were identified in seven patients. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Elective operations undertaken were eight hip replacements and one nail dynamisation. Eight emergency operations were undertaken: two DHS, one plating, one nailing, one revision nailing, two incision and drainages and one biopsy. All procedures were carried out using appropriate safety guidelines. Indications for surgery included femoral head osteonecrosis (n = 7), osteomyelitis (n = 3), proximal femoral fracture (n = 2), femoral shaft non-union (n = 1), dynamisation of a nail (n = 1), osteoarthritis (n = 1), fractured femur (n = 1), and revision nailing (n = 1). For two procedures the patient was not on highly active anti-retroviral treatment. All elective patients had CD4 counts greater than 200 pre-operatively. Six patients had undetectable viral loads. Of the eight emergency procedures, four procedures had no preoperative immune status recorded. Complications recorded were three non-unions, one nail fracture, one lesser trochanter fracture and recurrence of osteomyelitis. No surgical site infections were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Complications were not related to immune status. The rate of surgical site infection in both elective and emergency procedures was low. The elective surgery patients can safely receive orthopaedic treatment in their regional orthopaedic unit. Due to the high non-infectious complication rates recorded in the emergency group, transfer to a tertiary facility with infectious disease expertise is advised.
BACKGROUND: There are an estimated 6,900 people with HIV living in Ireland. There is a significant prevalence of femoral osteonecrosis and risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. With this potential, increasing surgical workload, it is important to assess surgical demand and audit outcomes. METHODS: The hospital's electronic records were examined. Between January 2005 and August 2011, 17 femoral surgeries were identified in seven patients. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Elective operations undertaken were eight hip replacements and one nail dynamisation. Eight emergency operations were undertaken: two DHS, one plating, one nailing, one revision nailing, two incision and drainages and one biopsy. All procedures were carried out using appropriate safety guidelines. Indications for surgery included femoral head osteonecrosis (n = 7), osteomyelitis (n = 3), proximal femoral fracture (n = 2), femoral shaft non-union (n = 1), dynamisation of a nail (n = 1), osteoarthritis (n = 1), fractured femur (n = 1), and revision nailing (n = 1). For two procedures the patient was not on highly active anti-retroviral treatment. All elective patients had CD4 counts greater than 200 pre-operatively. Six patients had undetectable viral loads. Of the eight emergency procedures, four procedures had no preoperative immune status recorded. Complications recorded were three non-unions, one nail fracture, one lesser trochanter fracture and recurrence of osteomyelitis. No surgical site infections were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Complications were not related to immune status. The rate of surgical site infection in both elective and emergency procedures was low. The elective surgery patients can safely receive orthopaedic treatment in their regional orthopaedic unit. Due to the high non-infectious complication rates recorded in the emergency group, transfer to a tertiary facility with infectious disease expertise is advised.
Authors: Karl Wieser; Patrick O Zingg; Michael Betz; Georg Neubauer; Claudio Dora Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2012-04-04 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Michelle M Estrella; Gregory D Kirk; Shruti H Mehta; Todd T Brown; Derek M Fine; Mohamed G Atta; Gregory M Lucas Journal: AIDS Date: 2012-01-28 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: F J Palella; K M Delaney; A C Moorman; M O Loveless; J Fuhrer; G A Satten; D J Aschman; S D Holmberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-03-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Giordano Madeddu; A Spanu; P Solinas; G M Calia; C Lovigu; F Chessa; M Mannazzu; A Falchi; M S Mura; Giuseppe Madeddu Journal: Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.346
Authors: Ian Williams; Duncan Churchill; Jane Anderson; Marta Boffito; Mark Bower; Gus Cairns; Kate Cwynarski; Simon Edwards; Sarah Fidler; Martin Fisher; Andrew Freedman; Anna Maria Geretti; Yvonne Gilleece; Rob Horne; Margaret Johnson; Saye Khoo; Clifford Leen; Neal Marshall; Mark Nelson; Chloe Orkin; Nicholas Paton; Andrew Phillips; Frank Post; Anton Pozniak; Caroline Sabin; Roy Trevelion; Andrew Ustianowski; John Walsh; Laura Waters; Edmund Wilkins; Alan Winston; Mike Youle Journal: HIV Med Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Andrew Kiboneka; Ricky Jones Nyatia; Christine Nabiryo; Aranka Anema; Curtis L Cooper; Kimberly Ann Fernandes; Julio S G Montaner; Edward J Mills Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-02-17
Authors: David E Bauer; Andreas Hingsammer; Lukas Ernstbrunner; Alexander Aichmair; Andrea B Rosskopf; Franziska Eckers; Karl Wieser; Sandro F Fucentese Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2017-10-14 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Maheshi P C Wijesekera; Simon Matthew Graham; David Griffith Lalloo; Hamish Simpson; William J Harrison Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 3.075