Literature DB >> 24916192

Recapitulating endochondral ossification: a promising route to in vivo bone regeneration.

Emmet M Thompson1,2,3, Amos Matsiko1,2,3, Eric Farrell4, Daniel J Kelly2,3,5, Fergal J O'Brien1,2,3.   

Abstract

Despite its natural healing potential, bone is unable to regenerate sufficient tissue within critical-sized defects, resulting in a non-union of bone ends. As a consequence, interventions are required to replace missing, damaged or diseased bone. Bone grafts have been widely employed for the repair of such critical-sized defects. However, the well-documented drawbacks associated with autografts, allografts and xenografts have motivated the development of alternative treatment options. Traditional tissue engineering strategies have typically attempted to direct in vitro bone-like matrix formation within scaffolds prior to implantation into bone defects, mimicking the embryological process of intramembranous ossification (IMO). Tissue-engineered constructs developed using this approach often fail once implanted, due to poor perfusion, leading to avascular necrosis and core degradation. As a result of such drawbacks, an alternative tissue engineering strategy, based on endochondral ossification (ECO), has begun to emerge, involving the use of in vitro tissue-engineered cartilage as a transient biomimetic template to facilitate bone formation within large defects. This is driven by the hypothesis that hypertrophic chondrocytes can secrete angiogenic and osteogenic factors, which play pivotal roles in both the vascularization of constructs in vivo and the deposition of a mineralized extracellular matrix, with resulting bone deposition. In this context, this review focuses on current strategies taken to recapitulate ECO, using a range of distinct cells, biomaterials and biochemical stimuli, in order to facilitate in vivo bone formation.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone; developmental engineering; endochondral ossification; hypertrophy; intramembranous ossification; mesenchymal stem cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24916192     DOI: 10.1002/term.1918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  42 in total

Review 1.  Bone repair with skeletal stem cells: rationale, progress to date and clinical application.

Authors:  Elena A Jones; Peter V Giannoudis; Dimitrios Kouroupis
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.346

2.  The inclusion of zinc into mineralized collagen scaffolds for craniofacial bone repair applications.

Authors:  Aleczandria S Tiffany; Danielle L Gray; Toby J Woods; Kiran Subedi; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Evaluation of an Engineered Hybrid Matrix for Bone Regeneration via Endochondral Ossification.

Authors:  Paiyz E Mikael; Aleksandra A Golebiowska; Xiaonan Xin; David W Rowe; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Mandibular Distraction in a Patient With Type II Collagenopathy.

Authors:  Rebecca M Garza; Jennifer C Alyono; David W Dorfman; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  Shape-fitting collagen-PLA composite promotes osteogenic differentiation of porcine adipose stem cells.

Authors:  Marley J Dewey; Eileen M Johnson; Daniel W Weisgerber; Matthew B Wheeler; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-03-22

6.  A timeseries analysis of the fracture callus extracellular matrix proteome during bone fracture healing.

Authors:  Christopher B Erickson; Ryan Hill; Donna Pascablo; Galateia Kazakia; Kirk Hansen; Chelsea Bahney
Journal:  J Life Sci (Westlake Village)       Date:  2021-12

7.  Ectopic models for endochondral ossification: comparing pellet and alginate bead culture methods.

Authors:  Holly E Weiss-Bilka; Megan E McGann; Matthew J Meagher; Ryan K Roeder; Diane R Wagner
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 3.963

8.  Perfusion Enhances Hypertrophic Chondrocyte Matrix Deposition, But Not the Bone Formation.

Authors:  Jonathan C Bernhard; Elizabeth Hulphers; Bernhard Rieder; James Ferguson; Dominik Rünzler; Thomas Nau; Heinz Redl; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 9.  Tissue engineering strategies for promoting vascularized bone regeneration.

Authors:  Sarah Almubarak; Hubert Nethercott; Marie Freeberg; Caroline Beaudon; Amit Jha; Wesley Jackson; Ralph Marcucio; Theodore Miclau; Kevin Healy; Chelsea Bahney
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Spatiotemporal Immunomodulation Using Biomimetic Scaffold Promotes Endochondral Ossification-Mediated Bone Healing.

Authors:  Yutong Liu; Zhaogang Yang; Lixuan Wang; Lili Sun; Betty Y S Kim; Wen Jiang; Yuan Yuan; Changsheng Liu
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 16.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.