R Brindle1, D Mullan2, B K Yap2, A Gandhi3. 1. North West Deanery, Manchester, UK. 2. The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK. 3. University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK. Electronic address: ashu.gandhi@uhsm.nhs.uk.
Abstract
AIMS: Increasing use of 18F-Fluorodeoxy glucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography (PET CT) has resulted in an increased frequency of incidentally discovered areas of focally increased FDG uptake within the thyroid gland - thyroid incidentalomas. We aimed to compare radiological characteristics of thyroid incidentalomas with cytology, histology and ultrasound findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined all FDG PET CT scan reports for all patients undergoing this investigation over a 6 year period in a single tertiary cancer centre. All PET CT scans followed an agreed proforma allowing reports mentioning "thyroid" to be identified. Reports commenting on a positive finding within the thyroid gland were investigated further manually. Incidental mentions of thyroid with no underlying abnormality were discounted from analysis. RESULTS: In the study period, 7221 patients underwent FDG PET CT scanning in our unit. Within this group 75 (1%) showed diffuse FDG uptake and 81 (1.1%) showed focal uptake (thyroid incidentalomas). Only 30 patients (37%) with incidentalomas had further investigation and malignancy rate was 23% (7/30). Median Standardised Uptake Values (SUV) in malignant lesions was 9.9 (range 3.5-17.8) whilst in benign lesions and diffuse lesions it was 5.4 (2.8-32) and 4.2 (2.1-25.6) respectively (p = 0.0013, Kruskal Wallis). CONCLUSION: There remains a need to develop a standardised approach to the investigation and management of thyroid incidentalomas discovered on FDG PET CT scanning. Up to 1 in 4 of these patients will harbour thyroid malignancy.
AIMS: Increasing use of 18F-Fluorodeoxy glucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography (PET CT) has resulted in an increased frequency of incidentally discovered areas of focally increased FDG uptake within the thyroid gland - thyroid incidentalomas. We aimed to compare radiological characteristics of thyroid incidentalomas with cytology, histology and ultrasound findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined all FDG PET CT scan reports for all patients undergoing this investigation over a 6 year period in a single tertiary cancer centre. All PET CT scans followed an agreed proforma allowing reports mentioning "thyroid" to be identified. Reports commenting on a positive finding within the thyroid gland were investigated further manually. Incidental mentions of thyroid with no underlying abnormality were discounted from analysis. RESULTS: In the study period, 7221 patients underwent FDG PET CT scanning in our unit. Within this group 75 (1%) showed diffuse FDG uptake and 81 (1.1%) showed focal uptake (thyroid incidentalomas). Only 30 patients (37%) with incidentalomas had further investigation and malignancy rate was 23% (7/30). Median Standardised Uptake Values (SUV) in malignant lesions was 9.9 (range 3.5-17.8) whilst in benign lesions and diffuse lesions it was 5.4 (2.8-32) and 4.2 (2.1-25.6) respectively (p = 0.0013, Kruskal Wallis). CONCLUSION: There remains a need to develop a standardised approach to the investigation and management of thyroid incidentalomas discovered on FDG PET CT scanning. Up to 1 in 4 of these patients will harbour thyroid malignancy.
Authors: Abhineet Uppal; Michael G White; Sapna Nagar; Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy; Paul J Chang; Peter Angelos; Edwin L Kaplan; Raymon H Grogan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Martin Barrio; Johannes Czernin; Michael W Yeh; Miguel F Palma Diaz; Pawan Gupta; Martin Allen-Auerbach; Christiaan Schiepers; Ken Herrmann Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Krzysztof Kaliszewski; Marta Strutyńska-Karpińska; Agnieszka Zubkiewicz-Kucharska; Beata Wojtczak; Paweł Domosławski; Waldemar Balcerzak; Tadeusz Łukieńczuk; Zdzisław Forkasiewicz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 3.240