Literature DB >> 24915856

The effect of age at diagnosis on prostate cancer mortality: a grade-for-grade and stage-for-stage analysis.

G Gandaglia1, P I Karakiewicz2, F Abdollah3, A Becker4, F Roghmann5, J D Sammon6, S P Kim7, P Perrotte8, A Briganti3, F Montorsi3, Q-D Trinh9, M Sun2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of advancing age on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) after radical prostatectomy (RP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 205,551 patients with PCa diagnosed between 1988 and 2009 within the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database were included in the study. Patients were stratified according to age at diagnosis: ≤ 50, 51-60, 61-70, and ≥ 71 years. The 15-year cumulative incidence CSM rates were computed. Competing-risks regression models were performed to test the effect of age on CSM in the entire cohort, and for each grade (Gleason score 2-4, 5-7, and 8-10) and stage (pT2, pT3a, and pT3b) sub-cohorts.
RESULTS: Advancing age was associated with higher 15-year CSM rates (2.3 vs. 3.4 vs. 4.6 vs. 6.3% for patients aged ≤ 50 vs. 51-60 vs. 61-70 vs. ≥ 71 years, respectively; P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, age at diagnosis was a significant predictor of CSM. This relationship was also observed in sub-analyses focusing on patients with Gleason score 5-7, and/or pT2 disease (all P ≤ 0.05). Conversely, age failed to reach the independent predictor status in men with Gleason score 2-4, 8-10, pT3a, and/or pT3b disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Advancing age increases the risk of CSM. However, when considering patients affected by more aggressive disease, age was not significantly associated with higher risk of dying from PCa. In high-risk patients, tumor characteristics rather than age should be considered when making treatment decisions.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age at diagnosis; Cancer-specific survival; Competing-risks; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24915856     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  6 in total

1.  Tumor characteristics, oncological and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy in very young men ≤ 45 years of age.

Authors:  Derya Tilki; Valentin Maurer; Raisa S Pompe; Felix K Chun; Felix Preisser; Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Philipp Mandel
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Treatment trends and Medicare reimbursements for localized prostate cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  Paolo Dell'oglio; Anne Sophie Valiquette; Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah; Zhe Tian; Vincent Trudeau; Alessandro Larcher; Shahrokh F Shariat; Umberto Capitanio; Alberto Briganti; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  The effects of serum from prostate cancer patients with elevated body mass index on prostate cancer cells in vitro.

Authors:  Benjamin C Mora; Neil E Fleshner; Laurence H Klotz; Vasundara Venkateswaran
Journal:  Lipid Insights       Date:  2015-04-19

Review 4.  Stopping screening, when and how?

Authors:  Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-02

5.  Gleason score stratification according to age at diagnosis in 1028 men.

Authors:  Pietro Pepe; Michele Pennisi
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2016-01-13

6.  Long-term oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: 10-year follow-up in Korea.

Authors:  Jungyo Suh; Jae Hyun Jung; Chang Wook Jeong; Sang Eun Lee; Eunsik Lee; Ja Hyeon Ku; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Cheol Kwak
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2020-04-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.