Kristin Y Popiel1, Mark A Miller. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether relaxing vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) precautions results in an increase in the incidence of invasive VRE infections over time. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a microbiology database before and after relaxation of VRE screening and isolation precautions. SETTING: Urban tertiary care teaching hospital in Montreal, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: All hospitalized and emergency room patients over a 13-year period from January 1, 2000, to March 31, 2013. METHODS: We assessed the results of all microbiology cultures for the presence of VRE as well as the results of all polymerase chain reaction assays for vanA and vanB during the study period. Applying criteria for 4 clinical situations (bacteremia, definite infection, possible infection, and colonization with VRE), we analyzed the effects of relaxed VRE screening and isolation precautions on the incidence of each of these outcomes over the time preceding and following this change. RESULTS: When VRE screening and isolation precautions were relaxed, a marked rise in VRE colonization was observed, with a lesser but definite rise in the 3 other outcomes. Despite this initial rise in all measures, all incidences other than colonization plateaued during the 34 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Relaxation of VRE screening and isolation precautions was associated with an immediate increase in colonization and infection incidence. Despite increasing colonization, infection outcomes remained infrequent and stable, suggesting a finite number of susceptible hosts at risk. Relaxation of VRE protocols may not lead to increasing infection incidence in a hospital setting, advocating that cost effectiveness exercises, with targeted screening and isolation precautions, are crucial.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether relaxing vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) precautions results in an increase in the incidence of invasive VRE infections over time. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a microbiology database before and after relaxation of VRE screening and isolation precautions. SETTING: Urban tertiary care teaching hospital in Montreal, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: All hospitalized and emergency room patients over a 13-year period from January 1, 2000, to March 31, 2013. METHODS: We assessed the results of all microbiology cultures for the presence of VRE as well as the results of all polymerase chain reaction assays for vanA and vanB during the study period. Applying criteria for 4 clinical situations (bacteremia, definite infection, possible infection, and colonization with VRE), we analyzed the effects of relaxed VRE screening and isolation precautions on the incidence of each of these outcomes over the time preceding and following this change. RESULTS: When VRE screening and isolation precautions were relaxed, a marked rise in VRE colonization was observed, with a lesser but definite rise in the 3 other outcomes. Despite this initial rise in all measures, all incidences other than colonization plateaued during the 34 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Relaxation of VRE screening and isolation precautions was associated with an immediate increase in colonization and infection incidence. Despite increasing colonization, infection outcomes remained infrequent and stable, suggesting a finite number of susceptible hosts at risk. Relaxation of VRE protocols may not lead to increasing infection incidence in a hospital setting, advocating that cost effectiveness exercises, with targeted screening and isolation precautions, are crucial.
Authors: Albert E Towers; Maci L Oelschlager; Madelyn Lorenz; Stephen J Gainey; Robert H McCusker; Steven A Krauklis; Gregory G Freund Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2019-05-17 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Sonia Pasquaroli; Barbara Citterio; Andrea Di Cesare; Mehdi Amiri; Anita Manti; Claudia Vuotto; Francesca Biavasco Journal: Pathogens Date: 2014-09-18
Authors: Arthur Tang; Kin On On Kwok; Vivian Wan In Wan In Wei; Hong Chen; Samuel Yeung Shan Yeung Shan Wong; Wilson Wai Sun Wai Sun Tam Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2021-02-24
Authors: Geoffrey Taylor; Denise Gravel; Anne Matlow; Joanne Embree; Nicole LeSaux; Lynn Johnston; Kathryn N Suh; Michael John; John Embil; Elizabeth Henderson; Virginia Roth; Alice Wong Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2016-05-21 Impact factor: 4.887
Authors: Stefanie Kampmeier; Dennis Knaack; Annelene Kossow; Stefanie Willems; Christoph Schliemann; Wolfgang E Berdel; Frank Kipp; Alexander Mellmann Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 4.887
Authors: Peter Kreidl; Astrid Mayr; Guido Hinterberger; Michael Berktold; Ludwig Knabl; Stefan Fuchs; Wilfried Posch; Stephan Eschertzhuber; Alois Obwegeser; Cornelia Lass-Flörl; Dorothea Orth-Höller Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 4.887