Literature DB >> 24913928

Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion rates performed without posterolateral fusion.

Adam J Bevevino1, Daniel G Kang2, Ronald A Lehman1, Gregory S Van Blarcum1, Scott C Wagner1, David E Gwinn1.   

Abstract

The need for posterolateral fusion (PLF) in addition to interbody fusion during minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has yet to be established. Omitting a PLF significantly reduces overall surface area available for achieving a solid arthrodesis, however it decreases the soft tissue dissection and costs of additional bone graft. The authors sought to perform a meta-analysis to establish the fusion rate of MIS TLIF performed without attempting a PLF. We performed an extensive Medline and Ovid database search through December 2010 revealing 39 articles. Inclusion criteria necessitated that a one or two level TLIF procedure was performed through a paramedian MIS approach with bilateral posterior pedicle screw instrumentation and without posterolateral bone grafting. CT scan verified fusion rates were mandatory for inclusion. Seven studies (case series and case-controls) met inclusion criteria with a total of 408 patients who underwent MIS TLIF as described above. The mean age was 50.7 years and 56.6% of patients were female. A total of 78.9% of patients underwent single level TLIF. Average radiographic follow-up was 15.6 months. All patients had local autologous interbody bone grafting harvested from the pars interarticularis and facet joint of the approach side. Either polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or allograft interbody cages were used in all patients. Overall fusion rate, confirmed by bridging trabecular interbody bone on CT scan, was 94.7%. This meta-analysis suggests that MIS TLIF performed with interbody bone grafting alone has similar fusion rates to MIS or open TLIF performed with interbody supplemented with posterolateral bone grafting and fusion. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fusion rates; MIS TLIF; Meta-analysis; Posterolateral fusion

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24913928     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.02.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  8 in total

1.  Successful Criteria for Indirect Decompression With Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Wicharn Yingsakmongkol; Khanathip Jitpakdee; Stephen Kerr; Worawat Limthongkul; Vit Kotheeranurak; Weerasak Singhatanadgige
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-08-10

Review 2.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - A narrative review on the present status.

Authors:  S Phani Kiran; G Sudhir
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-09-08

3.  [Comparative study of microendoscope-assisted and conventional minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases].

Authors:  Jianwen Dong; Yang Yang; Zihao Chen; Mingzhu Yu; Bin Liu; Qiyou Wang; Peigen Xie; Ruiqiang Chen; Limin Rong
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-07-15

4.  Evidence Based Medicine Review of Posterior Thoracolumbar Minimally Invasive Technology.

Authors:  Charla R Fischer; Bryan Beaubrun; Jordan Manning; Sheeraz Qureshi; Juan Uribe
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12-21

5.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylosis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bin-Fei Zhang; Chao-Yuan Ge; Bo-Long Zheng; Ding-Jun Hao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Guoxin Fan; Xinbo Wu; Shunzhi Yu; Qi Sun; Xiaofei Guan; Hailong Zhang; Xin Gu; Shisheng He
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Provides Sustained Improvements in Clinical and Radiological Outcomes up to 5 Years Postoperatively in Patients with Neurogenic Symptoms Secondary to Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak; Priyesh Dhoke; Kae-Sian Tay; William Yeo; Wai-Mun Yue
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-04-12

8.  Two-year results of a double-blind multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) versus silicon nitride spinal fusion cages in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders.

Authors:  Bryan J McEntire; Greg Maslin; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.