Literature DB >> 24913822

Use of singular value decomposition analysis to differentiate phosphorylated precursors in strong cation exchange fractions.

Rovshan G Sadygov1.   

Abstract

We studied the use of peak deviations (PDs) for application in phosphoproteomics. Due to the differences in the mass defects, the PDs of samples containing mixtures of phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated peptides show bimodal distributions. The ratios of peak heights accurately predict the phosphoproteome content of a sample. In this work, we apply a signal-processing tool, singular value decomposition, to reveal characteristic features of the phosphorylated, nonphosphorylated, and mixed samples. We show that a simple application of singular value decomposition to the PD matrix (i) detects transitions from mostly phosphorylated samples to mostly nonphosphorylated samples, (ii) reveals modes of low-abundance species in the presence of the high-abundance species (e.g., phosphorylated peptides), and (iii) simplifies the interpretation of the clustering of a covariance matrix obtained from PDs. As the eigenfunctions of the inner-product of the data matrix (made from the PDs) are Hermite functions, we observe a change of sign in the transition from samples enriched in phosphorylated peptides to samples containing fewer phosphorylated peptides. The ordering of the singular values of the data matrix points in the direction of changes to the phosphorylation content. No peptide identifications from a database were used for this study.
© 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mass defect; Peak deviation; Phosphopeptide enrichment; Phosphopeptides; Singular value decomposition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24913822      PMCID: PMC4518547          DOI: 10.1002/elps.201400053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electrophoresis        ISSN: 0173-0835            Impact factor:   3.535


  19 in total

1.  Probabilistic enrichment of phosphopeptides by their mass defect.

Authors:  Can Bruce; Mark A Shifman; Perry Miller; Erol E Gulcicek
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Mass defect labeling of cysteine for improving peptide assignment in shotgun proteomic analyses.

Authors:  Hilda Hernandez; Sarah Niehauser; Stacey A Boltz; Vijay Gawandi; Robert S Phillips; I Jonathan Amster
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Mass-based classification (MBC) of peptides: highly accurate precursor ion mass values can be used to directly recognize peptide phosphorylation.

Authors:  Bernhard Spengler; Alfons Hester
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Toward a comprehensive characterization of a human cancer cell phosphoproteome.

Authors:  Houjiang Zhou; Serena Di Palma; Christian Preisinger; Mao Peng; Ayse Nur Polat; Albert J R Heck; Shabaz Mohammed
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Evaluation of HCD- and CID-type fragmentation within their respective detection platforms for murine phosphoproteomics.

Authors:  Mark P Jedrychowski; Edward L Huttlin; Wilhelm Haas; Mathew E Sowa; Ramin Rad; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Examining troughs in the mass distribution of all theoretically possible tryptic peptides.

Authors:  Alexey V Nefedov; Indranil Mitra; Allan R Brasier; Rovshan G Sadygov
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Use of theoretical peptide distributions in phosphoproteome analysis.

Authors:  Mridul Kalita; Takhar Kasumov; Allan R Brasier; Rovshan G Sadygov
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Averagine-scaling analysis and fragment ion mass defect labeling in peptide mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Xudong Yao; Pamela Diego; Alexis A Ramos; Yu Shi
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Which missing value imputation method to use in expression profiles: a comparative study and two selection schemes.

Authors:  Guy N Brock; John R Shaffer; Richard E Blakesley; Meredith J Lotz; George C Tseng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  A parallel method for enumerating amino acid compositions and masses of all theoretical peptides.

Authors:  Alexey V Nefedov; Rovshan G Sadygov
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 3.307

View more
  3 in total

1.  Methods for analysis of size-exclusion chromatography-small-angle X-ray scattering and reconstruction of protein scattering.

Authors:  Andrew W Malaby; Srinivas Chakravarthy; Thomas C Irving; Sagar V Kathuria; Osman Bilsel; David G Lambright
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.304

2.  Mixed-effects model of epithelial-mesenchymal transition reveals rewiring of signaling networks.

Authors:  Poonam Desai; Jun Yang; Bing Tian; Hong Sun; Mridul Kalita; Hyunsu Ju; Adriana Paulucci-Holthauzen; Yingxin Zhao; Allan R Brasier; Rovshan G Sadygov
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.315

3.  Using SEQUEST with theoretically complete sequence databases.

Authors:  Rovshan G Sadygov
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.109

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.