Literature DB >> 24913645

The impact of 3 strategies for incorporating polled genetics into a dairy cattle breeding program on the overall herd genetic merit.

D M Spurlock1, M L Stock2, J F Coetzee2.   

Abstract

Dehorning in cattle has been associated with behavioral, physiological, and neuroendocrine responses indicative of pain. Unaddressed, the pain associated with a routine production procedure could contribute to a negative public perception of livestock production practices. Alternative considerations of dehorning include the selection of polled cattle within herds, thereby avoiding pain and production loss. As polledness results from an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance, genetic selection for polled cattle could reduce the prevalence of the horned trait. Herein we discuss 3 strategies to incorporate polled genetics into a cow herd and the estimated impact on the overall genetic merit of the herd. Furthermore, the availability and genetic merit of polled artificial insemination bulls in the United States is summarized. Both Holstein and Jersey dairy bulls registered with the National Association of Animal Breeders from December 2010 through April 2013 were queried. Polled bulls were identified as either being homozygous (PP) or heterozygous (Pp) and the average net merit (NM) predicted transmitting ability (PTA) of each sire group was calculated. The percentage of polled calves born each year over a 10-yr period was calculated for the following 3 scenarios: (A) various percentages of horned cows were randomly mated to Pp bulls, (B) various percentages of horned cows were preferentially mated to Pp bulls, and (C) horned cows were selectively mated to PP bulls, heterozygous cows to Pp bulls, and homozygous polled cows to horned bulls. Additionally, the change in NM PTA of the cow herd was calculated over the same period. The highest percentage of polled animals (87%) was achieved in scenario C. An evaluation of the herd NM PTA highlights the trade-offs associated with increasing polled genetics. Given the current genetic merit of horned and polled bulls, increasing the percentage of polled calves will decrease the NM PTA in Holstein, but may have minimal impact in Jersey herds. Decisions regarding selective breeding to increase polled genetics will need to be evaluated in the context of production objectives, cost of dehorning, and impact on overall genetic merit.
Copyright © 2014 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; dehorning; polled genetics; selection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24913645     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-7746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

1.  Production of hornless dairy cattle from genome-edited cell lines.

Authors:  Daniel F Carlson; Cheryl A Lancto; Bin Zang; Eui-Soo Kim; Mark Walton; David Oldeschulte; Christopher Seabury; Tad S Sonstegard; Scott C Fahrenkrug
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  A simple strategy for managing many recessive disorders in a dairy cattle breeding program.

Authors:  John B Cole
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Evaluation of breeding strategies for polledness in dairy cattle using a newly developed simulation framework for quantitative and Mendelian traits.

Authors:  Carsten Scheper; Monika Wensch-Dorendorf; Tong Yin; Holger Dressel; Herrmann Swalve; Sven König
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Optimized Genetic Testing for Polledness in Multiple Breeds of Cattle.

Authors:  Imtiaz A S Randhawa; Brian M Burns; Michael R McGowan; Laercio R Porto-Neto; Ben J Hayes; Ryan Ferretti; Karen M Schutt; Russell E Lyons
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Clove Oil Delays Rather Than Prevents Scur/Horn Growth in Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Mhairi Sutherland; Alan Julian; Frances Huddart
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2019-12-13

6.  Producer and Veterinarian Perspectives towards Pain Management Practices in the US Cattle Industry.

Authors:  Ivelisse Robles; Andreia G Arruda; Emma Nixon; Elizabeth Johnstone; Brooklyn Wagner; Lily Edwards-Callaway; Ronald Baynes; Johann Coetzee; Monique Pairis-Garcia
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Comparison of Gene Editing Versus Conventional Breeding to Introgress the POLLED Allele Into the Tropically Adapted Australian Beef Cattle Population.

Authors:  Maci L Mueller; John B Cole; Natalie K Connors; David J Johnston; Imtiaz A S Randhawa; Alison L Van Eenennaam
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.599

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.