Viraj Jayesh Mehta1, Virginia Miraldi Utz2, Elias I Traboulsi3, Paul J Rychwalski4. 1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt Eye Institute, Vanderbilt University, School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; Department of Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Abrahamson Eye Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; Executive Administration, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Electronic address: rychwalski@me.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare success rates of strabismus surgery that involves trainees versus those performed solely by staff surgeons. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative case series. SUBJECTS: Patients undergoing eye muscle surgery for primarily horizontal deviations. METHODS: Retrospective comparative case series of 543 patients (921 eyes) undergoing eye muscle surgery, with or without trainee participation, for horizontal deviations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success in surgery defined as residual horizontal deviations of 10 prism diopters or less. RESULTS: Trainees were involved in surgeries on 396 patients (672 eyes), whereas only staff surgeons operated on 147 patients (249 eyes). After minimum follow-up of 8 weeks, there was no overall significant difference between the success rates of procedures that involved trainees as surgeons and those that did not (P = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: The involvement of trainees as operators in surgeries on horizontal eye muscles does not result in a worse outcome than surgeries exclusively performed by staff. With a shift toward competency-based education and more scrutiny of patient outcomes, these data further support the quality of surgical care provided by trainees.
PURPOSE: To compare success rates of strabismus surgery that involves trainees versus those performed solely by staff surgeons. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative case series. SUBJECTS:Patients undergoing eye muscle surgery for primarily horizontal deviations. METHODS: Retrospective comparative case series of 543 patients (921 eyes) undergoing eye muscle surgery, with or without trainee participation, for horizontal deviations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success in surgery defined as residual horizontal deviations of 10 prism diopters or less. RESULTS: Trainees were involved in surgeries on 396 patients (672 eyes), whereas only staff surgeons operated on 147 patients (249 eyes). After minimum follow-up of 8 weeks, there was no overall significant difference between the success rates of procedures that involved trainees as surgeons and those that did not (P = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: The involvement of trainees as operators in surgeries on horizontal eye muscles does not result in a worse outcome than surgeries exclusively performed by staff. With a shift toward competency-based education and more scrutiny of patient outcomes, these data further support the quality of surgical care provided by trainees.