Literature DB >> 24913154

Improved survival among older acute myeloid leukemia patients - a population-based study.

Binay Kumar Shah1, Krishna Bilas Ghimire.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Survival in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has improved in younger patients over the last decade. This study was conducted to evaluate the relative survival rates in older AML patients over two decades in the US.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry database to evaluate relative survival rate in older (≥ 75 years) AML population diagnosed during 1992-2009. We selected AML patients from 13 registries of SEER 18 database to compare RS during 1992-2000 and 2001-2009.
RESULTS: The relative survival rates improved significantly during 2001-2009 compared to 1992-2000 for all age groups and sex. For young elderly patients (75-84 years) RS increased from 13.1 ± 0.8% to 17.4 ± 0.9% at one year Z-value = 3.98, p < 0.0001 and from 2.0 ± 0.4 to 2.6 ± 0.5%, Z-value = 3.61, p < 0.0005 at five years. Similarly, for very elderly (≥ 85 years) patients RS increased from 5.3 ± 1.0% to 8.0 ± 1.0%, Z-value = 3.03, p < 0.005 at one year, but no improvement seen at five years.
CONCLUSION: The relative survival in elderly AML has increased significantly during 2001-2009 compared to 1992-2000.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24913154     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.889851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  6 in total

1.  A new time-dependent approach for assessment of the impact of invasive aspergillosis shows effect on short- but not on long-term survival of patients with AML or high-risk MDS.

Authors:  R J van de Peppel; P A von dem Borne; S le Cessie; M G J de Boer
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Comparison of epigenetic versus standard induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients ≥60 years old.

Authors:  Neha Gupta; Austin Miller; Shipra Gandhi; Laurie A Ford; Carlos E Vigil; Elizabeth A Griffiths; James E Thompson; Meir Wetzler; Eunice S Wang
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 10.047

3.  Comparisons of commonly used front-line regimens on survival outcomes in patients aged 70 years and older with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Chetasi Talati; Varun C Dhulipala; Mar Tine Extermann; Najla Al Ali; Jongphil Kim; Rami Komrokji; Kendra Sweet; Andrew Kuykendall; Marina Sehovic; Tea Reljic; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Jeffrey E Lancet
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Patient-Centered Insights on Treatment Decision Making and Living with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Other Hematologic Cancers.

Authors:  Rebecca Crawford; Kate Sully; Rebecca Conroy; Chloe Johnson; Lynda Doward; Timothy Bell; Verna Welch; Francois Peloquin; Adam Gater
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 5.  Patterns of undertreatment among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): considerations for patients eligible for non-intensive chemotherapy (NIC).

Authors:  Elizabeth Hubscher; Slaven Sikirica; Timothy Bell; Andrew Brown; Verna Welch; Alexander Russell-Smith; Paul D'Amico
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Continued improvement in survival of acute myeloid leukemia patients: an application of the loss in expectation of life.

Authors:  H Bower; T M-L Andersson; M Björkholm; P W Dickman; P C Lambert; Å R Derolf
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 11.037

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.