| Literature DB >> 24913009 |
Fred Friedberg1, Janna Coronel2, Viktoria Seva2, Jenna L Adamowicz2, Anthony Napoli2.
Abstract
The purpose of this mixed methods study was to identify participants' attributions for their global impression of change ratings in a behavioral intervention for unexplained chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome. At 3-month follow-up, participants (N = 67) were asked "Why do you think you are (improved, unchanged, worse)?" Improved patients pointed to specific behavioral changes, unchanged patients referred to a lack of change in lifestyle, and worsened patients invoked stress and/or specific life events. Identifying patient perceptions of behaviors associated with patient global impression of change-rated improvement and non-improvement may assist in developing more effective management strategies in clinical care.Entities:
Keywords: attributions; chronic fatigue syndrome; global impression of change rating; mixed methods; worsening
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24913009 DOI: 10.1177/1359105314535458
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Psychol ISSN: 1359-1053