Literature DB >> 24912944

Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in Ireland: methods and response rates.

Linda M O'Keeffe1, Patricia M Kearney, Richard A Greene.   

Abstract

To describe response rates and characteristics associated with response to the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System study in Ireland (PRAMS Ireland). Using hospital discharge records of live births at a large, urban, obstetric hospital, a sampling frame of approximately 2,400 mother-infant pairs were used to alternately sample 1,200 women. Mothers' information including name, address, parity, age and infant characteristics such as sex and gestational age at delivery were extracted from records. Modes of contact included an invitation letter with option to opt out of the study, three mail surveys, a reminder letter and text message reminder for remaining non-respondents. Sixty-one per cent of women responded to the PRAMS Ireland survey over a 133 day response period. Women aged <30, single women, multiparous women and women with a preterm delivery were less likely to respond. Women participating in PRAMS Ireland were similar to the national birth profile in 2011 which had a mean age of 32, were 40 % primiparous, 33 % single or never married and had a 28 % caesarean section rate. Survey and protocol changes are required to increase response rates above recommended Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) thresholds of 65 % within the recommended 90 day data collection cycle. Additional efforts such as stratification and over-sampling are required to increase representativeness among hard to reach groups such as younger, single and multiparous women before expanding the project to an ongoing, national surveillance system in Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24912944     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-014-1527-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  13 in total

1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies on the association between maternal cigarette smoking and preterm delivery.

Authors:  N R Shah; M B Bracken
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Life course epidemiology.

Authors:  D Kuh; Y Ben-Shlomo; J Lynch; J Hallqvist; C Power
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): current methods and evaluation of 2001 response rates.

Authors:  Holly B Shulman; Brenda Colley Gilbert; Coi Gl Msphbrenda; Amy Lansky
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): methods and 1996 response rates from 11 states.

Authors:  B C Gilbert; H B Shulman; L A Fischer; M M Rogers
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1999-12

Review 5.  Birthweight and mortality in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kari R Risnes; Lars J Vatten; Jennifer L Baker; Karen Jameson; Ulla Sovio; Eero Kajantie; Merete Osler; Ruth Morley; Markus Jokela; Rebecca C Painter; Valter Sundh; Geir W Jacobsen; Johan G Eriksson; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Michael B Bracken
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 6.  Overweight and obesity in mothers and risk of preterm birth and low birth weight infants: systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Sarah D McDonald; Zhen Han; Sohail Mulla; Joseph Beyene
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-07-20

Review 7.  Birth weight, early weight gain, and subsequent risk of type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Harder; Katharina Roepke; Natasha Diller; Yvonne Stechling; Joachim W Dudenhausen; Andreas Plagemann
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Association between maternal alcohol consumption in early pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Fergus P McCarthy; Linda M O'Keeffe; Ali S Khashan; Robyn A North; Lucilla Poston; Lesley M E McCowan; Philip N Baker; Gus A Dekker; Claire T Roberts; James J Walker; Louise C Kenny
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Birth weight and long-term overweight risk: systematic review and a meta-analysis including 643,902 persons from 66 studies and 26 countries globally.

Authors:  Karen Schellong; Sandra Schulz; Thomas Harder; Andreas Plagemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Surveillance during pregnancy: methods and response rates from a hospital based pilot study of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in Ireland.

Authors:  Linda M O'Keeffe; Patricia M Kearney; Richard A Greene
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prevalence and predictors of alcohol use during pregnancy: findings from international multicentre cohort studies.

Authors:  Linda M O'Keeffe; Patricia M Kearney; Fergus P McCarthy; Ali S Khashan; Richard A Greene; Robyn A North; Lucilla Poston; Lesley M E McCowan; Philip N Baker; Gus A Dekker; James J Walker; Rennae Taylor; Louise C Kenny
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Feasibility Study of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in Iran.

Authors:  Roghieh Kharaghani; Mohammad Shariati; Masud Yunesian; Afsaneh Keramat; Alireza Moghisi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.429

3.  Positive lifestyle changes around the time of pregnancy: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Linda M O'Keeffe; Darren L Dahly; Marion Murphy; Richard A Greene; Janas M Harrington; Paul Corcoran; Patricia M Kearney
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Preventive health counselling during antenatal care using the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS) in Ireland.

Authors:  Marion Murphy; Sheena McHugh; Linda M O'Keeffe; Richard A Greene; Paul Corcoran; Patricia M Kearney
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.