Literature DB >> 24912430

Early assessment of minimal residual disease in AML by flow cytometry during aplasia identifies patients at increased risk of relapse.

T Köhnke1, D Sauter1, K Ringel1, E Hoster2, R P Laubender3, M Hubmann1, S K Bohlander4, P M Kakadia5, S Schneider1, A Dufour1, M-C Sauerland6, W E Berdel7, T Büchner7, B Wörmann8, J Braess9, W Hiddemann10, K Spiekermann11, M Subklewe12.   

Abstract

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry (flow MRD) after induction and consolidation therapy has been shown to provide independent prognostic information. However, data on the value of earlier flow MRD assessment are lacking. Therefore, the value of flow MRD detection was determined during aplasia in 178 patients achieving complete remission after treatment according to AMLCG (AML Cooperative Group) induction protocols. Flow MRD positivity during aplasia predicted poor outcome (5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) 16% vs 43%, P<0.001) independently from age and cytogenetic risk group (hazard ratio for MRD positivity 1.71; P=0.009). Importantly, the prognosis of patients without detectable MRD was neither impacted by morphological blast count during aplasia nor by MRD status postinduction. Early flow MRD was also evaluated in the context of existing risk factors. Flow MRD was prognostic within the intermediate cytogenetic risk group (5-year RFS 15% vs 37%, P=0.016) as well as for patients with normal karyotype and NPM1 mutations (5-year RFS 13% vs 49%, P=0.02) or FLT3-ITD (3-year RFS rates 9% vs 44%, P=0.016). Early flow MRD assessment can improve current risk stratification approaches by prediction of RFS in AML and might facilitate adaptation of postremission therapy for patients at high risk of relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24912430     DOI: 10.1038/leu.2014.186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  36 in total

1.  Minimal residual disease-directed therapy for childhood acute myeloid leukaemia: results of the AML02 multicentre trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Hiroto Inaba; Gary Dahl; Raul C Ribeiro; W Paul Bowman; Jeffrey Taub; Stanley Pounds; Bassem I Razzouk; Norman J Lacayo; Xueyuan Cao; Soheil Meshinchi; Barbara Degar; Gladstone Airewele; Susana C Raimondi; Mihaela Onciu; Elaine Coustan-Smith; James R Downing; Wing Leung; Ching-Hon Pui; Dario Campana
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Level of minimal residual disease after consolidation therapy predicts outcome in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  A Venditti; F Buccisano; G Del Poeta; L Maurillo; A Tamburini; C Cox; A Battaglia; G Catalano; B Del Moro; L Cudillo; M Postorino; M Masi; S Amadori
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Minimal residual disease detection defined as the malignant fraction of the total primitive stem cell compartment offers additional prognostic information in acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  M Terwijn; A Kelder; A N Snel; A P Rutten; W J Scholten; Y J M Oussoren; A A Van De Loosdrecht; S Zweegman; G J Ossenkoppele; G J Schuurhuis
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Double induction containing either two courses or one course of high-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone and postremission therapy by either autologous stem-cell transplantation or by prolonged maintenance for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Thomas Büchner; Wolfgang E Berdel; Claudia Schoch; Torsten Haferlach; Hubert L Serve; Joachim Kienast; Susanne Schnittger; Wolfgang Kern; Joelle Tchinda; Albrecht Reichle; Eva Lengfelder; Peter Staib; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Carlo Aul; Hartmut Eimermacher; Leopold Balleisen; Maria-Cristina Sauerland; Achim Heinecke; Bernhard Wörmann; Wolfgang Hiddemann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Prognostic and therapeutic implications of minimal residual disease detection in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Francesco Buccisano; Luca Maurillo; Maria Ilaria Del Principe; Giovanni Del Poeta; Giuseppe Sconocchia; Francesco Lo-Coco; William Arcese; Sergio Amadori; Adriano Venditti
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Cytogenetic and molecular diagnostic characterization combined to postconsolidation minimal residual disease assessment by flow cytometry improves risk stratification in adult acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Francesco Buccisano; Luca Maurillo; Alessandra Spagnoli; Maria Ilaria Del Principe; Daniela Fraboni; Paola Panetta; Tiziana Ottone; Maria Irno Consalvo; Serena Lavorgna; Pietro Bulian; Emanuele Ammatuna; Daniela F Angelini; Adamo Diamantini; Selenia Campagna; Licia Ottaviani; Chiara Sarlo; Valter Gattei; Giovanni Del Poeta; William Arcese; Sergio Amadori; Francesco Lo Coco; Adriano Venditti
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  The role of multiparameter flow cytometry for detection of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Adhra Al-Mawali; David Gillis; Ian Lewis
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Determination of relapse risk based on assessment of minimal residual disease during complete remission by multiparameter flow cytometry in unselected patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kern; Daniela Voskova; Claudia Schoch; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Susanne Schnittger; Torsten Haferlach
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Dose-dense induction with sequential high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantone (S-HAM) and pegfilgrastim results in a high efficacy and a short duration of critical neutropenia in de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a pilot study of the AMLCG.

Authors:  Jan Braess; Karsten Spiekermann; Peter Staib; Andreas Grüneisen; Bernhard Wörmann; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Hubert Serve; Albrecht Reichle; Rudolf Peceny; Daniel Oruzio; Christoph Schmid; Xaver Schiel; Marcus Hentrich; Christina Sauerland; Michael Unterhalt; Michael Fiegl; Wolfgang Kern; Christian Buske; Stefan Bohlander; Achim Heinecke; Herrad Baurmann; Dietrich W Beelen; Wolfgang E Berdel; Thomas Büchner; Wolfgang Hiddemann
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Rapid and sensitive screening for CEBPA mutations in acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Tobias Benthaus; Friederike Schneider; Gudrun Mellert; Evelyn Zellmeier; Stephanie Schneider; Purvi M Kakadia; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Stefan K Bohlander; Michaela Feuring-Buske; Jan Braess; Karsten Spiekermann; Annika Dufour
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2008-08-24       Impact factor: 6.998

View more
  17 in total

1.  Response assessment in acute myeloid leukemia by flow cytometry supersedes cytomorphology at time of aplasia, amends cases without molecular residual disease marker and serves as an independent prognostic marker at time of aplasia and post-induction.

Authors:  Thomas Köhnke; Veit Bücklein; Sandra Rechkemmer; Stephanie Schneider; Maja Rothenberg-Thurley; Klaus H Metzeler; Maria-Cristina Sauerland; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Karsten Spiekermann; Marion Subklewe
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Prognostic value of CD56 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shuangnian Xu; Xi Li; Jianmin Zhang; Jieping Chen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  How many cycles of 7+3 and for whom?

Authors:  Y Ofran; J M Rowe
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Antileukemia Efficacy and Mechanisms of Action of SL-101, a Novel Anti-CD123 Antibody Conjugate, in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Lina Han; Jeffrey L Jorgensen; Chris Brooks; Ce Shi; Qi Zhang; Graciela M Nogueras González; Antonio Cavazos; Rongqing Pan; Hong Mu; Sa A Wang; Jin Zhou; Gheath Ai-Atrash; Stefan O Ciurea; Mike Rettig; John F DiPersio; Jorge Cortes; Xuelin Huang; Hagop M Kantarjian; Michael Andreeff; Farhad Ravandi; Marina Konopleva
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Acute Myeloid Leukemia: How Do We Measure Success?

Authors:  Joshua P Sasine; Gary J Schiller
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 6.  Methods of Detection of Measurable Residual Disease in AML.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Brent L Wood
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.952

7.  Association of hematologic response and assay sensitivity on the prognostic impact of measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Short; Chenqi Fu; Donald A Berry; Roland B Walter; Sylvie D Freeman; Christopher S Hourigan; Xuelin Huang; Graciela Nogueras Gonzalez; Hyunsoo Hwang; Xinyue Qi; Hagop Kantarjian; Shouhao Zhou; Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 12.883

8.  Pre-transplantation minimal residual disease with cytogenetic and molecular diagnostic features improves risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Betül Oran; Jeff L Jorgensen; David Marin; Sa Wang; Sairah Ahmed; Amin M Alousi; Borje S Andersson; Qaiser Bashir; Roland Bassett; Genevieve Lyons; Julianne Chen; Katy Rezvani; Uday Popat; Partow Kebriaei; Keyur Patel; Gabriela Rondon; Elizabeth J Shpall; Richard E Champlin
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  Clinical significance of day 5 peripheral blast clearance rate in the evaluation of early treatment response and prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Cong Yu; Qing-lei Kong; Yun-xiang Zhang; Xiang-qin Weng; Jing Wu; Yan Sheng; Chun-lei Jiang; Yong-mei Zhu; Qi Cao; Shu-min Xiong; Jun-min Li; Xiao-dong Xi; Sai-juan Chen; Bing Chen
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 17.388

10.  Prognostic Value of CD11b Expression Level for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shuangnian Xu; Xi Li; Jianmin Zhang; Jieping Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.