OBJECTIVE: Whereas in the U.S. and Canada the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model has proven to be highly effective in enhancing employment perspectives for persons with severe mental illnesses, the evidence base is less abundant in countries with a different socioeconomic climate. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of IPS in the Dutch socioeconomic context. METHOD: A multisite randomized controlled trial was performed following 151 persons with severe mental illnesses expressing an explicit wish for regular employment, comparing IPS with traditional vocational rehabilitation (TVR). Primary outcome was the proportion of persons who were competitively employed over a period of 30 months. Secondary outcomes were self-reported quality of life, self-esteem and mental health. Additionally, the impact of being engaged in competitive employment on these secondary outcomes was examined. RESULTS: In 30 months, 44% of IPS participants found competitive work, compared with 25% of participants supported by TVR. No direct effect of IPS on mental health, self-esteem or quality of life was found. Being competitively employed before follow-up measurements was significantly associated with an increase in mental health, self-esteem and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study strongly confirms that IPS is an effective method in helping people with severe mental illnesses find competitive work also in countries characterized by a relatively protective socioeconomic climate putting up unintended barriers to employment. The implementation of IPS on a larger scale seems warranted, and new studies are needed on the mechanisms through which IPS works.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Whereas in the U.S. and Canada the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model has proven to be highly effective in enhancing employment perspectives for persons with severe mental illnesses, the evidence base is less abundant in countries with a different socioeconomic climate. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of IPS in the Dutch socioeconomic context. METHOD: A multisite randomized controlled trial was performed following 151 persons with severe mental illnesses expressing an explicit wish for regular employment, comparing IPS with traditional vocational rehabilitation (TVR). Primary outcome was the proportion of persons who were competitively employed over a period of 30 months. Secondary outcomes were self-reported quality of life, self-esteem and mental health. Additionally, the impact of being engaged in competitive employment on these secondary outcomes was examined. RESULTS: In 30 months, 44% of IPSparticipants found competitive work, compared with 25% of participants supported by TVR. No direct effect of IPS on mental health, self-esteem or quality of life was found. Being competitively employed before follow-up measurements was significantly associated with an increase in mental health, self-esteem and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study strongly confirms that IPS is an effective method in helping people with severe mental illnesses find competitive work also in countries characterized by a relatively protective socioeconomic climate putting up unintended barriers to employment. The implementation of IPS on a larger scale seems warranted, and new studies are needed on the mechanisms through which IPS works.
Authors: Lone Hellström; Pernille Pedersen; Thomas Nordahl Christensen; Iben Gammelgaard Wallstroem; Anders Bo Bojesen; Elsebeth Stenager; Ulrika Bejerholm; Jooske van Busschbach; Harry Michon; Kim T Mueser; Silje Endresen Reme; Sarah White; Lene Falgaard Eplov Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2021-03-04
Authors: Miljana Vukadin; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Harry W C Michon; Bart Cillekens; Peter M van de Ven; Trees Juurlink; Johannes R Anema Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 4.144
Authors: Lars de Winter; Chrisje Couwenbergh; Jaap van Weeghel; Sarita Sanches; Harry Michon; Gary R Bond Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 7.818
Authors: Yvonne B Suijkerbuijk; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Joost C van Mechelen; Anneli Ojajärvi; Marc Corbière; Johannes R Anema Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-09-12
Authors: Lieke Lammerts; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Willem van Mechelen; Johannes R Anema Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Vigdis Sveinsdottir; Torill Helene Tveito; Gary R Bond; Astrid Louise Grasdal; Stein Atle Lie; Silje Endresen Reme Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 3.295