Literature DB >> 24911784

The decline in gross efficiency in relation to cycling time-trial length.

Dionne A Noordhof1, Roy C Mulder, Katherine R Malterer, Carl Foster, Jos J de Koning.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether gross efficiency (GE), determined during submaximal cycling, is lower after time trials and if the magnitude of the decrease differs in relation to race distance. Secondary purposes were to study the rate of the decline in GE and whether changes in muscle-fiber recruitment could explain the decline.
METHODS: Cyclists completed 9 GE tests consisting of submaximal exercise performed before and after time trials of different length (500 m, 1000 m, 2000 m, 4000 m, 15,000 m, and 40,000 m). In addition, subjects performed time trials as if they were a 1000-m, 4000-m, or 40,000-m time trial during which they were stopped at 50% of the final time of the preceding "full" time trial. Power output, gas exchange, and EMG were measured continuously throughout the GE tests.
RESULTS: A significant interaction effect between distance and time was found for GE (P = .001). GE was significantly lower immediately after the time trials than before (P < .05), and the decline in GE differed between distances (P < .001). GE seemed to decline linearly during the relatively short trials, while it declined more hyperbolically during the 40,000-m. A significant effect of time (P = .04) on mean EMG amplitude was found. However, post hoc comparisons showed no significant differences in mean EMG amplitude between the different time points (before and after the time trials).
CONCLUSION: GE decreases during time-trial exercise. Unfortunately, the cause of the decrease remains uncertain. Future modeling studies should consider using a declining instead of a constant GE. In sport situations, the declining GE has to be taken into account when selecting a pacing strategy.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24911784     DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2014-0034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform        ISSN: 1555-0265            Impact factor:   4.010


  12 in total

1.  Anaerobic work capacity in cycling: the effect of computational method.

Authors:  Erik P Andersson; Philipp Bachl; Anna Schmuttermair; Craig A Staunton; Thomas L Stöggl
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Effect of caffeine ingestion on anaerobic capacity quantified by different methods.

Authors:  Lucyana Arcoverde; Rodrigo Silveira; Fabiano Tomazini; André Sansonio; Romulo Bertuzzi; Adriano Eduardo Lima-Silva; Victor Amorim Andrade-Souza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A Comparison of Methodological Approaches to Measuring Cycling Mechanical Efficiency.

Authors:  Pekka Matomäki; Vesa Linnamo; Heikki Kyröläinen
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2019-06-10

4.  Self-Selected Pacing during a 24 h Track Cycling World Record.

Authors:  Beat Knechtle; Thomas Rosemann; Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Using Field Based Data to Model Sprint Track Cycling Performance.

Authors:  Hamish A Ferguson; Chris Harnish; J Geoffrey Chase
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2021-03-16

6.  The Anaerobic Capacity of Cross-Country Skiers: The Effect of Computational Method and Skiing Sub-technique.

Authors:  Erik P Andersson; Dionne A Noordhof; Nestor Lögdal
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-04-15

7.  The Impact of Pre-Exercise Carbohydrate Meal on the Effects of Yerba Mate Drink on Metabolism, Performance, and Antioxidant Status in Trained Male Cyclists.

Authors:  Thaiana C Krolikowski; Fernando K Borszcz; Vilma P Panza; Laura M Bevilacqua; Sarah Nichele; Edson L da Silva; Renata D M C Amboni; Luiz G A Guglielmo; Stuart M Phillips; Ricardo D de Lucas; Brunna C B Boaventura
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-07-16

8.  The Dynamics of the Anaerobic Energy Contribution During a Simulated Mass-Start Competition While Roller-Ski Skating on a Treadmill.

Authors:  Dionne A Noordhof; Marius Lyng Danielsson; Knut Skovereng; Jørgen Danielsen; Trine M Seeberg; Pål Haugnes; Jan Kocbach; Gertjan Ettema; Øyvind B Sandbakk
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2021-07-08

9.  A Comparison between Different Methods of Estimating Anaerobic Energy Production.

Authors:  Erik P Andersson; Kerry McGawley
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 10.  Crossing the Golden Training Divide: The Science and Practice of Training World-Class 800- and 1500-m Runners.

Authors:  Thomas Haugen; Øyvind Sandbakk; Eystein Enoksen; Stephen Seiler; Espen Tønnessen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.