| Literature DB >> 24910613 |
Yan Wang1, Kewei Chen2, Jiacai Zhang1, Li Yao3, Ke Li4, Zhen Jin4, Qing Ye1, Xiaojuan Guo3.
Abstract
Recent neuroimaging studies have revealed normal aging-related alterations in functional and structural brain networks such as the default mode network (DMN). However, less is understood about specific brain structural dependencies or interactions between brain regions within the DMN in the normal aging process. In this study, using Bayesian network (BN) modeling, we analyzed gray matter volume data from 109 young and 82 old subjects to characterize the influence of aging on associations between core brain regions within the DMN. Furthermore, we investigated the discriminability of the aging-associated BN models for the young and old groups. Compared to their young counterparts, the old subjects showed significant reductions in connections from right inferior temporal cortex (ITC) to medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), right hippocampus (HP) to right ITC, and mPFC to posterior cingulate cortex and increases in connections from left HP to mPFC and right inferior parietal cortex to right ITC. Moreover, the classification results showed that the aging-related BN models could predict group membership with 88.48% accuracy, 88.07% sensitivity, and 89.02% specificity. Our findings suggest that structural associations within the DMN may be affected by normal aging and provide crucial information about aging effects on brain structural networks.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian network modeling; default mode network; gray matter; normal aging; structural associations
Year: 2014 PMID: 24910613 PMCID: PMC4038778 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Brain regions and the corresponding abbreviations of eight ROIs in the DMN.
| Brain regions | Abbreviations |
|---|---|
| Posterior cingulate cortex | PCC |
| Medial prefrontal cortex | mPFC |
| Left hippocampus | lHP |
| Right hippocampus | rHP |
| Left inferior parietal cortex | lIPC |
| Right inferior parietal cortex | rIPC |
| Left inferior temporal cortex | lITC |
| Right inferior temporal cortex | rITC |
Figure 1Bayesian network models of the DMN in the young (left panel) and old (right panel) groups. The arrows represent dependencies among brain regions and the thickness of the arrows is proportional to the strength of the connections. The asterisks indicate the connections that were significantly stronger in young/old than in old/young groups.
List of connections and the corresponding weight coefficients in the Bayesian network models of the young and old groups.
| Connections | Weight coefficients of connections | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Young | Old | ||
| I | lHP → mPFC | 0.284 | 0.292 |
| rITC → lITC | 0.784 | 0.723 | |
| rITC → mPFC | 0.469 | 0.372 | |
| II | rHP → rITC | 0.576 | |
| PCC → lIPC | 0.422 | ||
| mPFC → PCC | 0.548 | ||
| mPFC → lIPC | 0.292 | ||
| III | lITC → lHP | 0.425 | |
| rIPC → rITC | 0.559 | ||
| PCC → rIPC | 0.576 | ||
| IV | rHP → lHP | 0.921 | |
| lHP → rHP | 0.773 | ||
| rIPC → lIPC | 0.649 | ||
| lIPC → rIPC | 0.625 | ||
Part I of this table lists connections that exist in both groups. Parts II and III show the connections present only in the young and old groups, respectively. Part IV lists connections that are opposite in direction in two groups.
The probabilities of Type-I errors for between-group differences in all connections.
| Young > Old | Old > Young | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Connections | Probabilities | Connections | Probabilities |
| lHP → mPFC | 1.000 | ||
| rITC → lITC | 0.334 | rITC → lITC | 0.666 |
| rITC → mPFC | 1.000 | ||
| lITC → lHP | 0.064 | ||
| PCC → lIPC | 0.150 | ||
| PCC → rIPC | 0.832 | ||
| mPFC → lIPC | 0.220 | lHP → rHP | 0.145 |
| rHP → lHP | 0.232 | rIPC → lIPC | 0.236 |
| lIPC → rIPC | 0.233 | ||
The column “Young > Old” displays the probabilities of type-I errors in the hypothesis that the strength of connections in the young group is stronger than in the old group. The other column “Old > Young” shows the opposite. The probabilities marked in bold indicate significantly stronger connections (.