| Literature DB >> 24910275 |
Daniel P Friedmann1, Mathew M Avram, Steven R Cohen, Diane I Duncan, Mitchel P Goldman, Elliot T Weiss, V Leroy Young.
Abstract
A large and growing population of patients currently seeks minimally invasive therapeutic options for the aesthetic treatment of localized, central abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). We sought to evaluate the ideal population for aesthetic treatment of central abdominal SAT, highlight the existing disparities between SAT in obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30; BMI) and nonobese (BMI < 30) patients, and review the available FDA-cleared, minimally invasive treatment options for central abdominal adiposity. The cosmetic issue of localized, central (periumbilical) abdominal adiposity in nonobese individuals is quite distinct from abdominal bulging secondary to obesity. Given the recognized clinical and physiologic differences between obese and nonobese counterparts, the exclusion of obese patients from clinical study by currently available FDA-cleared devices targeting abdominal fat, and the status of obesity as a chronic, systemic disease requiring medical, surgical, and/or lifestyle-altering therapies, minimally invasive therapeutic options for aesthetic reductions in central abdominal SAT must be limited to the nonobese population.Entities:
Keywords: body mass index; central abdominal adiposity; cryolipolysis; high-intensity focused ultrasound; obesity; subcutaneous adipose tissue
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24910275 DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cosmet Dermatol ISSN: 1473-2130 Impact factor: 2.696