BACKGROUND: The diagnostic value of unenhanced computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing acute aortic dissection (AAD) and ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 219 consecutive patients who visited the emergency room with suspected acute aortic syndrome (AAS) because of chest or back pain and who underwent both unenhanced and contrast-enhanced 64-row multi-detector CT. The unenhanced CT findings were evaluated by the cardiologist on duty who was blind to the findings of contrast-enhanced CT. Diagnosis of AAS was confirmed in 103 patients (47%, 95 AAD and 8 ruptured TAA patients) based on evaluation of both unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT images, which was used as the reference standard for validating the diagnostic value of the unenhanced CT findings. Sensitivity and specificity of the findings of a high-attenuation crescent, which represents hematoma in the aortic wall, were 61.2% and 99.1%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of linear high density in the aorta, which represents an intimal flap, were 59.2% and 96.6%, respectively. If unenhanced CT showed none of high-attenuation crescent, linear high density, internal displacement of intimal calcification, or TAA, the negative predictive value was 93.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Unenhanced CT is a good tool for ruling AAS in, but the false-negative rate of 6.7% is high for ruling AAS out because it has to be the minimum possible.
BACKGROUND: The diagnostic value of unenhanced computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing acute aortic dissection (AAD) and ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 219 consecutive patients who visited the emergency room with suspected acute aortic syndrome (AAS) because of chest or back pain and who underwent both unenhanced and contrast-enhanced 64-row multi-detector CT. The unenhanced CT findings were evaluated by the cardiologist on duty who was blind to the findings of contrast-enhanced CT. Diagnosis of AAS was confirmed in 103 patients (47%, 95 AAD and 8 ruptured TAApatients) based on evaluation of both unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT images, which was used as the reference standard for validating the diagnostic value of the unenhanced CT findings. Sensitivity and specificity of the findings of a high-attenuation crescent, which represents hematoma in the aortic wall, were 61.2% and 99.1%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of linear high density in the aorta, which represents an intimal flap, were 59.2% and 96.6%, respectively. If unenhanced CT showed none of high-attenuation crescent, linear high density, internal displacement of intimal calcification, or TAA, the negative predictive value was 93.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Unenhanced CT is a good tool for ruling AAS in, but the false-negative rate of 6.7% is high for ruling AAS out because it has to be the minimum possible.
Authors: Varut Vardhanabhuti; Edward Nicol; Gareth Morgan-Hughes; Carl A Roobottom; Giles Roditi; Mark C K Hamilton; Russell K Bull; Franchesca Pugliese; Michelle C Williams; James Stirrup; Simon Padley; Andrew Taylor; L Ceri Davies; Roger Bury; Stephen Harden Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 3.039