Literature DB >> 24909804

Digital planning for foot and ankle deformity correction: Evans osteotomy.

Noman A Siddiqui1, Bradley M Lamm2.   

Abstract

Preoperative planning is commonly performed for many foot and ankle procedures. The purpose of the present study was to prospectively determine the preoperative digital planning accuracy of predicting the calcaneal graft size used during the "Evans" calcaneal osteotomy. Preoperative digital deformity correction planning, using a standard planning method (TraumaCad(®) software), was performed on 10 feet scheduled to undergo an Evans procedure. Of the 10 patients, 6 were female and 4 were male, with an average age of 43 ± 22 years. Digital planning was used to predict the Evans graft size. The surgeon was unaware of the predicted graft size, which was then compared with the actual graft size inserted during the procedure. In addition, the pre- and postoperative radiographic angles were recorded and compared (anteroposterior view, talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneocuboid abduction; lateral view, calcaneal inclination angle; and axial view, tibial-calcaneal angle). The average preoperative talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneocuboid angle, calcaneal inclination angle, and tibial-calcaneal angle measured 21° ± 9.6°, 28.3° ± 9.0°, 13.8° ± 5.7°, and 15.3° ± 8.2°, respectively. The preoperative tibial-calcaneal position was 2.8 ± 1.2 mm. The radiographic weightbearing angles measured at an average follow-up of 7.4 (range 6 to 12) months improved to 6.3° ± 7.4° (p = .0015), 12.3° ± 6.1° (p < .001), 21.3° ± 7.7° (p = .0122), and 2.2° ± 3.6° (p = .0019) for the talo-first metatarsal, calcaneocuboid abduction, calcaneal inclination, and tibial-calcaneal angles, respectively. The final tibial-calcaneal position measured 1.4 ± 0.7 mm (p < .001). The preoperative Evans graft measurement (11.8 ± 2.6 mm) compared with the actual graft (12.2 ± 1.3 mm) placed was within 0.4 ± 1.8 mm (p = .51). Preoperative digital planning for Evans calcaneal osteotomy has been shown to be a valuable tool for predicting the surgical graft size for accurate pedal realignment.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TraumaCad(®); calcaneus; deformity correction; radiographic angle; tibial–calcaneal angle

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24909804     DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  3 in total

1.  Pedobarographic changes during first month after subtalar extra-articular screw arthroereisis (SESA) operation of juvenile flexible flatfoot.

Authors:  Lasse Hagen; Jonas Paul Pape; Mark Kostakev; Christian-Dominik Peterlein
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Simulated operation combined with patient-specific instrumentation technology is superior to conventional technology for supramalleolar osteotomy: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Chenggong Wang; Dengjie Yu; Can Xu; Mingqing Li; Da Zhong; Long Wang; Hua Liu; Yusheng Li
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  The Resolution Axis Method (RAM) for lengthening of the femur with or without associated frontal plane deformity (a new method).

Authors:  Sherif Galal
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2018-05-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.