James E Montgomery1, Kyle G Mathews, Denis J Marcellin-Little, Steve Hendrick, James C Brown.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare radiographic and computed tomography (CT) measurements of tracheal size as would be made for the purpose of tracheal stent size selection. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-over. ANIMALS: Dogs (n = 15).
METHODS: Canine cadavers without evidence of tracheal or respiratory disease were used for CT and digital radiography of the neck and thorax. Three observers each made 3 independent measurements at each of 5 tracheal locations, and also measured tracheal length, on each radiograph and for each CT scan on each cadaver.
RESULTS: CT tracheal measurements were on average 1.03 mm larger (P < .01) compared with radiographic measurements for all 3 observers.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic measurements of the canine trachea consistently underestimate tracheal size, and CT measurements are preferable for selecting tracheal stent size. © Copyright 2014 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
OBJECTIVE: To compare radiographic and computed tomography (CT) measurements of tracheal size as would be made for the purpose of tracheal stent size selection. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-over. ANIMALS: Dogs (n = 15).
METHODS: Canine cadavers without evidence of tracheal or respiratory disease were used for CT and digital radiography of the neck and thorax. Three observers each made 3 independent measurements at each of 5 tracheal locations, and also measured tracheal length, on each radiograph and for each CT scan on each cadaver.
RESULTS: CT tracheal measurements were on average 1.03 mm larger (P < .01) compared with radiographic measurements for all 3 observers.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic measurements of the canine trachea consistently underestimate tracheal size, and CT measurements are preferable for selecting tracheal stent size. © Copyright 2014 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014
PMID: 24909798 DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12227.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Surg ISSN: 0161-3499 Impact factor: 1.495