Literature DB >> 24909128

Importance of guiding catheter disengagement during measurement of fractional flow reserve in patients with an isolated proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis.

Adel Aminian1, Dariouch Dolatabadi, Pascal Lefebvre, Georges Khalil, Robert Zimmerman, Georges Michalakis, Jacques Lalmand.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of ostial guiding catheter disengagement during measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with an isolated proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) stenosis.
METHODS: Measurements of FFR were performed in 21 patients with an isolated intermediate lesion of the proximal LAD. Proximal aortic pressure (Pa), distal post stenotic pressure (Pd), and Pd/Pa were recorded at baseline, after at least 90 sec of intravenous (IV) adenosine infusion with the guiding catheter still engaged in the coronary ostium (Pa1 , Pd1 , FFReng ), and after at least 30 sec of guiding catheter disengagement back to the aorta (Pa2 , Pd2 , FFRdis ).
RESULTS: The average value of Pd/Pa at baseline was 0.92 ± 0.04. After 110 ± 8 sec of IV adenosine infusion, FFReng was 0.81 ± 0.07, which decreased to 0.77 ± 0.08 (FFRdis ) after 38 ± 6 sec of guiding catheter disengagement. The mean ΔFFR (FFReng  - FFRdis ) was 0.05 ± 0.04. As compared to baseline values, the mean change in FFR values was significantly increased after disengagement of the guiding catheter (Pd/Pabaseline  - FFRdis vs. Pd/Pabaseline  - FFReng , 0.15 ± 0.05 vs. 0.10 ± 0.04, P < 0.0001). Before guiding catheter disengagement, eight patients (38%) had an FFR value ≤ 0.8. Following disengagement of the guiding catheter, the new FFR values decreased below 0.8 in six additional patients (28%), with subsequent change in treatment strategy.
CONCLUSIONS: During FFR assessment of isolated intermediate proximal LAD lesions, guiding catheter disengagement is associated with a decrease in mean FFR values. In patients with FFR values lying close to the treatment threshold, this can have an impact on treatment strategy.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fractional flow reserve; guiding catheter; pitfalls; pressure tracings

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24909128     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  3 in total

Review 1.  Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics-update 2022.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Kawase; Hitoshi Matsuo; Shoichi Kuramitsu; Yasutsugu Shiono; Takashi Akasaka; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Tetsuya Amano; Ken Kozuma; Masato Nakamura; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Yoshio Kobayashi; Yuji Ikari
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2022-05-11

2.  FFR pressure wire comparative study for drift: piezo resistive versus optical sensor.

Authors:  Daan Cottens; Bert Ferdinande; Jawed Polad; Mathias Vrolix; Koen Ameloot; Ief Hendrickx; Ella Poels; Joren Maeremans; Jo Dens
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2022-02-15

3.  What should be the role of fractional flow reserve measurement in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?

Authors:  David Glineur; Aun Yeong Chong; Juan Grau
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-11-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.