Literature DB >> 24908551

Simplification to coformulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir versus continuation of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor with emtricitabine and tenofovir in adults with virologically suppressed HIV (STRATEGY-PI): 48 week results of a randomised, open-label, phase 3b, non-inferiority trial.

Jose R Arribas1, Gilles Pialoux2, Joseph Gathe3, Giovanni Di Perri4, Jacques Reynes5, Pablo Tebas6, Thai Nguyen7, Ramin Ebrahimi7, Kirsten White7, David Piontkowsky7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with HIV on antiretroviral therapy might benefit from regimen simplification to reduce pill burden and dosing frequency. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of simplifying the treatment regimen for adults with virologically suppressed HIV infection from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor and emtricitabine plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir) regimen to coformulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir.
METHODS: STRATEGY-PI is a 96 week, international, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial in which HIV-infected adults with a plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load of less than 50 copies per mL for at least 6 months who were taking a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor with emtricitabine plus tenofovir were randomly assigned (2:1) either to switch to coformulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir or to continue on their existing regimen. Key eligibility criteria included no history of virological failure, no resistance to emtricitabine and tenofovir, and creatinine clearance of 70 mL/min or higher. Neither participants nor investigators were masked to group allocation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a viral load of less than 50 copies per mL at week 48, based on a US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm for the modified intention-to-treat population, which excluded major protocol violations (prohibited resistance or not receiving a protease inhibitor at baseline). We prespecified non-inferiority with a 12% margin; if non-inferiority was established, superiority was tested as per a prespecified sequential testing procedure. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01475838.
FINDINGS: Between Dec 12, 2011, and Dec 20, 2012, 433 participants were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of study drug. Of these participants, 293 were assigned to switch to the simplified regimen (switch group) and 140 to remain on their existing regimen (no-switch group); after exclusions, 290 and 139 participants, respectively, were analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population. At week 48, 272 (93·8%) of 290 participants in the switch group maintained a viral load of less than 50 copies per mL, compared with 121 (87·1%) of 139 in the no-switch group (difference 6·7%, 95% CI 0·4-13·7; p=0·025). The statistical superiority of the simplified regimen was mainly caused by a higher proportion of participants in the no-switch group than in the switch group discontinuing treatment for non-virological reasons; virological failure was rare in both groups (two [1%] of 290 vs two [1%] of 139). We did not detect any treatment-emergent resistance in either group. Adverse events leading to discontinuation were rare in both groups (six [2%] of 293 vs four [3%] of 140). Switching to the simplified regimen was associated with a small, non-progressive increase from baseline in serum creatinine concentration. Nausea was more common in the switch group than in the no-switch group, but rates of diarrhoea and bloating decreased compared with baseline from week 4 to week 48 in the switch group, whereas there were generally no changes for these symptoms in the no-switch group.
INTERPRETATION: Coformulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir might be a useful regimen simplification option for virologically supressed adults with HIV taking a multitablet ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor regimen. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24908551     DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70782-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis        ISSN: 1473-3099            Impact factor:   25.071


  35 in total

1.  Simplification of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and the brain-a real-life experience.

Authors:  Gabriele Arendt; Svenja Schlonies; Eser Orhan; Olaf Stüve
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.643

2.  Accumulated pre-switch resistance to more recently introduced one-pill-once-a-day antiretroviral regimens impacts HIV-1 virologic outcome.

Authors:  Rebecca Reece; Allison Delong; D'Antuono Matthew; Karen Tashima; Rami Kantor
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 3.  Alternative switching strategies based on regimens with a low genetic barrier: do clinicians have a choice nowadays?

Authors:  Jesús Troya; Pablo Ryan; Rocío Montejano; Alfonso Cabello; Guillermo Cuevas; Mariano Matarranz; Irene Cañamares; Javier Solís; Luis Álvarez-Sala Walther
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Antiretroviral Drugs for Treatment and Prevention of HIV Infection in Adults: 2016 Recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel.

Authors:  Huldrych F Günthard; Michael S Saag; Constance A Benson; Carlos del Rio; Joseph J Eron; Joel E Gallant; Jennifer F Hoy; Michael J Mugavero; Paul E Sax; Melanie A Thompson; Rajesh T Gandhi; Raphael J Landovitz; Davey M Smith; Donna M Jacobsen; Paul A Volberding
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Cobicistat Versus Ritonavir: Similar Pharmacokinetic Enhancers But Some Important Differences.

Authors:  Alice Tseng; Christine A Hughes; Janet Wu; Jason Seet; Elizabeth J Phillips
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 6.  Impact of antiretroviral therapy on lipid metabolism of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: Old and new drugs.

Authors:  Joel da Cunha; Luciana Morganti Ferreira Maselli; Ana Carolina Bassi Stern; Celso Spada; Sérgio Paulo Bydlowski
Journal:  World J Virol       Date:  2015-05-12

7.  Concordance of HIV-1 RNA Values by Amplicor and TaqMan 2.0 in Patients With Confirmed Suppression in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Will Garner; Kirsten White; Javier Szwarcberg; Scott McCallister; Lijie Zhong; Mike Wulfsohn
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Effectiveness of integrase strand transfer inhibitors among treatment-experienced patients in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Thibaut Davy-Mendez; Sonia Napravnik; Oksana Zakharova; David A Wohl; Claire E Farel; Joseph J Eron
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 9.  Inflammation, Immune Activation, and Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV.

Authors:  Corrilynn O Hileman; Nicholas T Funderburg
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.071

Review 10.  HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitors: A Comparative Review of Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Kimberly K Scarsi; Joshua P Havens; Anthony T Podany; Sean N Avedissian; Courtney V Fletcher
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.