Literature DB >> 24908468

Female genital cutting in Hargeisa, Somaliland: is there a move towards less severe forms?

Ingvild Bergom Lunde1, Mette Sagbakken2.   

Abstract

According to several sources, little progress is being made in eliminating the cutting of female genitalia. This paper, based on qualitative interviews and observations, explores perceptions of female genital cutting and elimination of the phenomenon in Hargeisa, Somaliland. Two main groups of participants were interviewed: (1) 22 representatives of organisations whose work directly relates to female genital cutting; and (2) 16 individuals representing different groups of society. It was found that there is an increasing use of medical staff and equipment when a girl undergoes the procedure of female genital cutting; the use of terminology is crucial in understanding current perceptions of female genital cutting; religion is both an important barrier and facilitator of elimination; and finally, traditional gender structures are currently being challenged in Hargeisa. The findings of this study suggest that it is important to consider current perceptions on practices of female genital cutting and on abandonment of female genital cutting, in order to gain useful knowledge on the issue of elimination. The study concludes that elimination of female genital cutting is a multifaceted process which is constantly negotiated in a diversity of social settings.
Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Health Matters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Somalia; Somaliland; female genital mutilation/cutting; gender roles and gender issues; reproductive health policy and programmes

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24908468     DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(14)43759-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health Matters        ISSN: 0968-8080


  9 in total

1.  Discourses of change: The shift from infibulation to sunna circumcision among Somali and Sudanese migrants in Norway.

Authors:  R Elise B Johansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Baseline data from a planned RCT on attitudes to female genital cutting after migration: when are interventions justified?

Authors:  Anna Wahlberg; Sara Johnsdotter; Katarina Ekholm Selling; Carina Källestål; Birgitta Essén
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Factors associated with the support of pricking (female genital cutting type IV) among Somali immigrants - a cross-sectional study in Sweden.

Authors:  Anna Wahlberg; Sara Johnsdotter; Katarina Ekholm Selling; Carina Källestål; Birgitta Essén
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Virility, pleasure and female genital mutilation/cutting. A qualitative study of perceptions and experiences of medicalized defibulation among Somali and Sudanese migrants in Norway.

Authors:  R Elise B Johansen
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 5.  Decision-Making Process in Female Genital Mutilation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Angi Alradie-Mohamed; Russell Kabir; S M Yasir Arafat
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Understanding the association between parental attitudes and the practice of female genital mutilation among daughters.

Authors:  Claudia Cappa; Claire Thomson; Colleen Murray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Negotiating Female Genital Cutting in a Transnational Context.

Authors:  R Elise B Johansen; Salma A E Ahmed
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2021-02

8.  Estimating the magnitude of female genital mutilation/cutting in Norway: an extrapolation model.

Authors:  Mai M Ziyada; Marthe Norberg-Schulz; R Elise B Johansen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Debating medicalization of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C): learning from (policy) experiences across countries.

Authors:  Els Leye; Nina Van Eekert; Simukai Shamu; Tammary Esho; Hazel Barrett
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.223

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.