Literature DB >> 24908243

Outcome analysis of single incision vs traditional multiport sleeve gastrectomy: a matched cohort study.

Ameer Gomberawalla1, Arsalan Salamat, Rami Lutfi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single incision laparoscopy remains controversial due to technical challenges which may cause suboptimal outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and equivalency of the single incision sleeve gastrectomy (SISG) when compared to the traditional multiport sleeve gastrectomy (MPSG) approach in a matched cohort evaluating technical aspects and postoperative results.
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in a consecutive cohort of 113 SG (MPSG = 77, SISG = 36). The 36 patients who underwent SISG were included as the case group. Thirty-six MPSG patients were included in the control group, in 1:1 ratio with cases after matching for BMI, age, race, gender, and additional demographic data. Operative time (OT) in minutes and length of stay (LOS) in days was measured and excess weight loss (EWL) at 6 months and 1 year was collected and evaluated.
RESULTS: Mean BMI was equivalent (SISG 43.06, MPSG 43.72, p = 0.36). Mean OT for the SISG was 116.78 and 118.25 for the MPSG (p = 0.84), and mean LOS was 1.80 for the SISG and 1.75 for the MSPG (p = 0.75). EWL at 6 months was 58.4 % for the SISG and 58.5 % for the MPSG (p = 0.98) and 72.3 and 74.1 % (p = 0.77) for 1 year, respectively. There were no leaks in either group. There was one reoperation for postoperative bleeding in the MPSG group.
CONCLUSIONS: Sleeve gastrectomy can be performed safely using single incision techniques with equivalent outcomes for weight loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24908243     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1312-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  17 in total

1.  Single incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS): a novel technique.

Authors:  Alan A Saber; Mohamed H Elgamal; Ed A Itawi; Arun J Rao
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Predictors of success after laparoscopic gastric bypass: a multivariate analysis of socioeconomic factors.

Authors:  R Lutfi; A Torquati; N Sekhar; W O Richards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic single-port sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: preliminary series.

Authors:  Paolo Gentileschi; Ida Camperchioli; Domenico Benavoli; Nicola Di Lorenzo; Giuseppe Sica; Achille L Gaspari
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 4.734

4.  Changes in the makeup of bariatric surgery: a national increase in use of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Ninh T Nguyen; Brian Nguyen; Alana Gebhart; Samuel Hohmann
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Psychological outcomes and predictors of initial weight loss outcomes among severely obese adolescents receiving laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Robyn Sysko; Michael J Devlin; Tom B Hildebrandt; Stephanie K Brewer; Jeffrey L Zitsman; B Timothy Walsh
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 6.  A review of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity.

Authors:  Xinzhe Shi; Shahzeer Karmali; Arya M Sharma; Daniel W Birch
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Single-incision sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--a randomised pilot study.

Authors:  Muffazal A Lakdawala; Nor Hisham Muda; Sunita Goel; Aparna Bhasker
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 8.  The evolution of minimally invasive bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Andrew J Batchelder; Robert Williams; Christopher Sutton; Achal Khanna
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Marks; Melissa S Phillips; Roberto Tacchino; Kurt Roberts; Raymond Onders; George DeNoto; Gary Gecelter; Eugene Rubach; Homero Rivas; Arsalla Islam; Nathaniel Soper; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Alexander Rosemurgy; Sharona Ross; Sajani Shah
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 10.  Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henry Buchwald; Yoav Avidor; Eugene Braunwald; Michael D Jensen; Walter Pories; Kyle Fahrbach; Karen Schoelles
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  9 in total

1.  Reply to the Letter to the Editor Submitted by Michel Gagner (Publish with OBSU-D-15-00482).

Authors:  Scott A Shikora; Christine Brown Mahoney
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Postoperative Bleeding and Leakage After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Mousa Khoursheed; Ibtisam Al-Bader; Ali Mouzannar; Aqeel Ashraf; Yousef Bahzad; Abdulla Al-Haddad; Ali Sayed; Abe Fingerhut
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Reduced-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbidly Obese Japanese Patients: a Retrospective Case-Matched Study.

Authors:  Manabu Amiki; Yosuke Seki; Kazunori Kasama; Srinivasulu Pachimatla; Michiko Kitagawa; Akiko Umezawa; Yoshimochi Kurokawa
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Single Incision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Review.

Authors:  Anastasios Stefanopoulos; Konstantinos P Economopoulos; Vasileios Kalles
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Prospective Comparison and Quality of Life for Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Series of Morbidly Obese Patients.

Authors:  Andrea Porta; Alberto Aiolfi; Cinzia Musolino; Ilaria Antonini; Marco Antonio Zappa
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Task performance in standard laparoscopy in comparison with single-incision laparoscopy in a modified skills trainer.

Authors:  Andrew S Wright; Saurabh Khandelwal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Salvador Morales-Conde; Andrea Peeters; Yannick M Meyer; Stavros A Antoniou; Isaías Alarcón Del Agua; Alberto Arezzo; Simone Arolfo; Amir Ben Yehuda; Luigi Boni; Elisa Cassinotti; Giovanni Dapri; Tao Yang; Sofie Fransen; Antonello Forgione; Shahab Hajibandeh; Shahin Hajibandeh; Michele Mazzola; Marco Migliore; Christof Mittermair; Doris Mittermair; Antonio Morandeira-Rivas; Carlos Moreno-Sanz; Andrea Morlacchi; Eran Nizri; Myrthe Nuijts; Jonas Raakow; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Amir Szold; Helmut Weiss; Michael Weiss; Ricardo Zorron; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michel Gagner; Paul Kemmeter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Safety and effectiveness of reduced-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Asian morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Yeshong Park; Young Suk Park; Sangjun Lee; So Hyun Kang; Eunju Lee; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Yun-Suhk Suh; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.