Literature DB >> 24907917

Cryopreservation and delayed embryo transfer-assisted reproductive technology registry and reporting implications.

Kevin J Doody1.   

Abstract

Clinics performing assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures have collected data via registry and publicly reported pregnancy outcomes for more than 25 years. During this time, the practice of ART has changed considerably with frozen embryo transfer (FET) procedures contributing an increasing proportion of live births. Cycles initiated with the intent of embryo banking for the purpose of fertility preservation have been excluded from these public reports, because pregnancy outcomes are not immediately available. An unintended consequence of the common sense handling of fertility preservation has been that cycles performed with intentional short-term cryopreservation of all embryos for other indications have also been excluded from the report. Over the last few years, cryopreservation with short-term delayed transfer increasingly has been performed for reasons other than fertility preservation. The pregnancy outcomes of these cycles are expected within a reasonable time frame and should be transparently reported. The Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology has collaborated with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to "recapture" these cycles for the public reports. This recapture is done by linking the FET cycles to the stimulation cycles from which the embryos were derived and by changing the labels of the outcome success metrics. Stimulations using ART, initiated for the purpose of transferring embryos within 1 year will be included in the report despite any prospective intent to freeze all eggs or embryos. A positive outcome will be reported when a live birth results from the first embryo transfer following stimulation ("primary transfer"). Linkage of ovarian stimulation and egg-retrieval procedures to FET will also allow development of other success metrics to further benefit fertility patients.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Success rates; assisted reproduction; reporting

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24907917     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  18 in total

1.  For whom the egg thaws: insights from an analysis of 10 years of frozen egg thaw data from two UK clinics, 2008-2017.

Authors:  Zeynep B Gürtin; Lucy Morgan; David O'Rourke; Jinjun Wang; Kamal Ahuja
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Delayed versus immediate frozen embryo transfer after oocyte retrieval: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jialyu Huang; Jiaying Lin; Xuefeng Lu; Renfei Cai; Ning Song; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Replacing single frozen-thawed euploid embryos in a natural cycle in ovulatory women may increase live birth rates compared to medicated cycles in anovulatory women.

Authors:  Alexis P Melnick; Robert Setton; Logan D Stone; Nigel Pereira; Kangpu Xu; Zev Rosenwaks; Steven D Spandorfer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Effect of Embryo Banking on U.S. National Assisted Reproductive Technology Live Birth Rates.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; David H Barad; David F Albertini; Sarah K Darmon; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Observational retrospective study of US national utilisation patterns and live birth rates for various ovarian stimulation protocols for in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; Sarah K Darmon; David H Barad; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A freeze-all strategy does not increase live birth rates in women of advanced reproductive age.

Authors:  K Lattes; S López; M A Checa; M Brassesco; D García; R Vassena
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Using Medroxyprogesterone Acetate and hMG in Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Treated for IVF: A Double-Blind Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Qiuju Chen; NingLing Wang; Hong Chen; Qifeng Lyu; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Comparison of the effect of immediate versus delayed transfer following a stimulated IVF cycle on the ongoing pregnancy rate of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  He Li; Lu Li; Xiang Lu; Xiaoxi Sun; Ernest Hung Yu Ng
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Knockdown of pleiotrophin increases the risk of preeclampsia following vitrified-thawed embryo transfer.

Authors:  Shengxian Liu; Fang Wang; Gelin Liu
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 5.650

10.  Embryo cryopreservation and utilization in the United States from 2004-2013.

Authors:  Mindy S Christianson; Judy E Stern; Fangbai Sun; Heping Zhang; Aaron K Styer; Wendy Vitek; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.