Literature DB >> 24907871

Randomized, controlled trial comparing the effects of anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, desflurane and sevoflurane on pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Jaime Ortiz1, Lee C Chang2, Daniel A Tolpin2, Charles G Minard3, Bradford G Scott4, Jose M Rivers2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain is the primary complaint and the main reason for prolonged recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The authors hypothesized that patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy will have less pain four hours after surgery when receiving maintenance of anesthesia with propofol when compared to isoflurane, desflurane, or sevoflurane.
METHODS: In this prospective, randomized trial, 80 patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were assigned to propofol, isoflurane, desflurane, or sevoflurane for the maintenance of anesthesia. Our primary outcome was pain measured on the numeric analog scale four hours after surgery. We also recorded intraoperative use of opioids as well as analgesic consumption during the first 24h after surgery.
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores four hours after surgery (p=0.72). There were also no statistically significant differences in pain scores between treatment groups during the 24h after surgery (p=0.45). Intraoperative use of fentanyl and morphine did not vary significantly among the groups (p=0.21 and 0.24, respectively). There were no differences in total morphine and hydrocodone/APAP use during the first 24h (p=0.61 and 0.53, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Patients receiving maintenance of general anesthesia with propofol do not have less pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy when compared to isoflurane, desflurane, or sevoflurane.
Copyright © 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inhalational anesthetics; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Pain; Propofol

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24907871     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol


  6 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of different regimens of anesthesia for day surgery in China.

Authors:  Liang Shen; Yan Luo; Zhijun Lu; Xiang Hu; Wen Ding; Buwei Yu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

Review 2.  Total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for adults undergoing transabdominal robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Suzanne Forsyth Herling; Bjørn Dreijer; Gitte Wrist Lam; Thordis Thomsen; Ann Merete Møller
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-04

3.  The Effect of Sevoflurane Plus Propofol on Pain and Complications after Laminectomy: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Aminolah Vasigh; Fatemeh Najafi; Molouk Jaafarpour; Javaher Khajavikhan; Ali Khani
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-04-01

4.  Comparison of effects of desflurane and sevoflurane on postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain in patients receiving opioid-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after thyroidectomy: Propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Il Jae Yoon; Hyun Kang; Chong Wha Baek; Geun Joo Choi; Yong-Hee Park; Yong Hun Jung; Young Cheol Woo; Sangseok Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hou-Chuan Lai; Meei-Shyuan Lee; Kuen-Tze Lin; Yi-Hsuan Huang; Jen-Yin Chen; Yao-Tsung Lin; Kuo-Chuan Hung; Zhi-Fu Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison between intravenous and intrathecal clonidine for postoperative analgesia of patients submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Christiane Rodrigues da Silva; Cinthya Iamile Frithz Brandão de Oliveira; Juscimar Carneiro Nunes
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-06-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.