Literature DB >> 24907708

Improving upon the efficiency of complete case analysis when covariates are MNAR.

Jonathan W Bartlett1, James R Carpenter2, Kate Tilling3, Stijn Vansteelandt4.   

Abstract

Missing values in covariates of regression models are a pervasive problem in empirical research. Popular approaches for analyzing partially observed datasets include complete case analysis (CCA), multiple imputation (MI), and inverse probability weighting (IPW). In the case of missing covariate values, these methods (as typically implemented) are valid under different missingness assumptions. In particular, CCA is valid under missing not at random (MNAR) mechanisms in which missingness in a covariate depends on the value of that covariate, but is conditionally independent of outcome. In this paper, we argue that in some settings such an assumption is more plausible than the missing at random assumption underpinning most implementations of MI and IPW. When the former assumption holds, although CCA gives consistent estimates, it does not make use of all observed information. We therefore propose an augmented CCA approach which makes the same conditional independence assumption for missingness as CCA, but which improves efficiency through specification of an additional model for the probability of missingness, given the fully observed variables. The new method is evaluated using simulations and illustrated through application to data on reported alcohol consumption and blood pressure from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, in which data are likely MNAR independent of outcome.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complete case analysis; Missing covariates; Missing not at random; Multiple imputation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24907708      PMCID: PMC4173105          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxu023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  6 in total

1.  Bias and efficiency of multiple imputation compared with complete-case analysis for missing covariate values.

Authors:  Ian R White; John B Carlin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Discussion of "Identifiability and estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance and completely nonignorable missing data".

Authors:  Dylan S Small; Jing Cheng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data.

Authors:  Shaun R Seaman; Ian R White
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Analysis of semi-parametric regression models with non-ignorable non-response.

Authors:  A Rotnitzky; J Robins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997 Jan 15-Feb 15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Non-response models for the analysis of non-monotone ignorable missing data.

Authors:  J M Robins; R D Gill
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997 Jan 15-Feb 15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls.

Authors:  Jonathan A C Sterne; Ian R White; John B Carlin; Michael Spratt; Patrick Royston; Michael G Kenward; Angela M Wood; James R Carpenter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-29
  6 in total
  9 in total

1.  Multivariable modeling of factors associated with spinal pain in young adolescence.

Authors:  Mieke Dolphens; Stijn Vansteelandt; Barbara Cagnie; Andry Vleeming; Jo Nijs; Guy Vanderstraeten; Lieven Danneels
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  When Is a Complete-Case Approach to Missing Data Valid? The Importance of Effect-Measure Modification.

Authors:  Rachael K Ross; Alexander Breskin; Daniel Westreich
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Identification and inference with nonignorable missing covariate data.

Authors:  Wang Miao; Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.261

4.  Missing covariates in competing risks analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan W Bartlett; Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Elucidating age and sex-dependent association between frontal EEG asymmetry and depression: An application of multiple imputation in functional regression.

Authors:  Adam Ciarleglio; Eva Petkova; Ofer Harel
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  The Impact of COVID-19 on Transit Workers: Perceptions of Employer Responses and Associations with Health Factors.

Authors:  Sean P M Rice; Leah S Greenspan; Talya N Bauer; Jarred Rimby; Todd E Bodner; Ryan Olson
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.779

7.  Asymptotically Unbiased Estimation of Exposure Odds Ratios in Complete Records Logistic Regression.

Authors:  Jonathan W Bartlett; Ofer Harel; James R Carpenter
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Missing continuous outcomes under covariate dependent missingness in cluster randomised trials.

Authors:  Anower Hossain; Karla Diaz-Ordaz; Jonathan W Bartlett
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Accounting for missing data in statistical analyses: multiple imputation is not always the answer.

Authors:  Rachael A Hughes; Jon Heron; Jonathan A C Sterne; Kate Tilling
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 7.196

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.