| Literature DB >> 24907649 |
Na Ry Son1, Dong Joo Seo1, Min Hwa Lee1, Sheungwoo Seo1, Xiaoyu Wang1, Bog-Hieu Lee2, Jeong-Su Lee3, In-Sun Joo3, In-Gyun Hwang3, Changsun Choi4.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop an optimal technique for detecting hepatitis E virus (HEV) in swine livers. Here, three elution buffers and two concentration methods were compared with respect to enhancing recovery of HEV from swine liver samples. Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and nested RT-PCR were performed to detect HEV RNA. When phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) was used to concentrate HEV in swine liver samples using ultrafiltration, real-time RT-PCR detected HEV in 6 of the 26 samples. When threonine buffer was used to concentrate HEV using polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation and ultrafiltration, real-time RT-PCR detected HEV in 1 and 3 of the 26 samples, respectively. When glycine buffer was used to concentrate HEV using ultrafiltration and PEG precipitation, real-time RT-PCR detected HEV in 1 and 3 samples of the 26 samples, respectively. When nested RT-PCR was used to detect HEV, all samples tested negative regardless of the type of elution buffer or concentration method used. Therefore, the combination of real-time RT-PCR and ultrafiltration with PBS buffer was the most sensitive and reliable method for detecting HEV in swine livers.Entities:
Keywords: Concentration; Elution; Hepatitis E virus (HEV); Nested reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (nested RT-PCR); Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24907649 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.05.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Virol Methods ISSN: 0166-0934 Impact factor: 2.014