Literature DB >> 24907497

Physiologic and cortical response to acute psychosocial stress in left temporal lobe epilepsy - a pilot cross-sectional fMRI study.

Jane B Allendorfer1, Heidi Heyse2, Lucy Mendoza3, Erik B Nelson2, James C Eliassen2, Judd M Storrs4, Jerzy P Szaflarski5.   

Abstract

Stress is commonly reported as a seizure precipitant in individuals with poorly controlled seizures including temporal lobe epilepsy. The aim of the study was to assess the neural and physiologic correlates of psychosocial stress response during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and their relationship with seizure occurrence in patients with left temporal lobe epilepsy (LTLE). We enrolled 23 patients with LTLE and 23 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs); all underwent fMRI with control math task (CMT) and stress math task (SMT) and pre-/post-fMRI salivary cortisol analysis (acute stress reactivity calculated as % reduction from post-stress to recovery baseline; dCORT). The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) were administered. T-tests of performance and cortisol variables were performed. Processing and single-subject modeling of fMRI response to CMT positive feedback and SMT negative feedback, group comparisons, and whole-brain correlation of seizure occurrence and fMRI response in patients with poorly controlled LTLE were performed. Patients with LTLE and healthy controls were similar in demographics, math performance, heart rate, and PSS-10 scores (all p>0.05). Patients with LTLE exhibited greater dCORT (p=0.048) and lower BDI-II scores (p=0.016) compared with HCs. Patients with poorly controlled LTLE showed a positive association between seizure frequency and dCORT (r=0.73, p=0.016). Functional MRI activation to feedback was similar between groups, including midfrontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital regions. Regression analyses revealed no group differences to positive feedback, but, compared with HCs, patients with LTLE showed decreased activation to negative feedback in the left cerebellum/middle occipital/fusiform gyri, left hippocampus/parahippocampus, bilateral medial frontal/cingulate/superior frontal gyri, right postcentral gyrus/inferior parietal lobule, and right insula/postcentral gyrus (p<0.05, corrected). Patients with poorly controlled LTLE showed negative association between seizure frequency and activation in the bilateral subgenual anterior cingulate (p<0.05, corrected). This study is the first to characterize the cortical and physiologic responses to acute psychosocial stress and to show a significant relationship between seizure control in LTLE and both the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and fMRI signal reactivity to acute psychosocial stress. These findings extend our understanding of the complex interplay between stress, physiologic stress markers, and seizures/epilepsy.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortisol; HPA axis; LTLE; Seizure control; Stress response; fMRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24907497     DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Behav        ISSN: 1525-5050            Impact factor:   2.937


  17 in total

1.  Neural response to stress and perceived stress differ in patients with left temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Adam M Goodman; Jane B Allendorfer; Heidi Heyse; Basia A Szaflarski; James C Eliassen; Erik B Nelson; Judd M Storrs; Jerzy P Szaflarski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Amygdala and prefrontal cortex activity varies with individual differences in the emotional response to psychosocial stress.

Authors:  Tyler R Orem; Muriah D Wheelock; Adam M Goodman; Nathaniel G Harnett; Kimberly H Wood; Ethan W Gossett; Douglas A Granger; Sylvie Mrug; David C Knight
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 3.  Autonomic manifestations of epilepsy: emerging pathways to sudden death?

Authors:  Roland D Thijs; Philippe Ryvlin; Rainer Surges
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 42.937

4.  Neural functional connectivity changes to psychosocial stress in young adults with bipolar disorder and preliminary associations with clinical trajectories.

Authors:  Dylan E Kirsch; Alex Preston; Valeria Tretyak; Vanessa Le; Wade Weber; Stephen M Strakowski; Elizabeth T C Lippard
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 5.345

Review 5.  Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis dysfunction in epilepsy.

Authors:  Aynara C Wulsin; Matia B Solomon; Michael D Privitera; Steve C Danzer; James P Herman
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-05-16

6.  Editorial introduction: The effects of somatic disease and environmental insults on the stress response.

Authors:  Gretchen N Neigh; Jennifer C Felger
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-03

7.  Anticipatory stress associated with functional magnetic resonance imaging: Implications for psychosocial stress research.

Authors:  Ethan W Gossett; Muriah D Wheelock; Adam M Goodman; Tyler R Orem; Nathaniel G Harnett; Kimberly H Wood; Sylvie Mrug; Douglas A Granger; David C Knight
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 8.  Recent Advances in Neuroimaging of Epilepsy.

Authors:  Adam M Goodman; Jerzy P Szaflarski
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 7.620

9.  Prefrontal Cortex Activity Is Associated with Biobehavioral Components of the Stress Response.

Authors:  Muriah D Wheelock; Nathaniel G Harnett; Kimberly H Wood; Tyler R Orem; Douglas A Granger; Sylvie Mrug; David C Knight
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Combining non-pharmacological treatments with pharmacotherapies for neurological disorders: a unique interface of the brain, drug-device, and intellectual property.

Authors:  Grzegorz Bulaj
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.