Literature DB >> 24907363

Translating research for health policy: researchers' perceptions and use of social media.

David Grande1, Sarah E Gollust2, Maximilian Pany3, Jane Seymour4, Adeline Goss5, Austin Kilaru6, Zachary Meisel7.   

Abstract

As the United States moves forward with health reform, the communication gap between researchers and policy makers will need to be narrowed to promote policies informed by evidence. Social media represent an expanding channel for communication. Academic journals, public health agencies, and health care organizations are increasingly using social media to communicate health information. For example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now regularly tweets to 290,000 followers. We conducted a survey of health policy researchers about using social media and two traditional channels (traditional media and direct outreach) to disseminate research findings to policy makers. Researchers rated the efficacy of the three dissemination methods similarly but rated social media lower than the other two in three domains: researchers' confidence in their ability to use the method, peers' respect for its use, and how it is perceived in academic promotion. Just 14 percent of our participants reported tweeting, and 21 percent reported blogging about their research or related health policy in the past year. Researchers described social media as being incompatible with research, of high risk professionally, of uncertain efficacy, and an unfamiliar technology that they did not know how to use. Researchers will need evidence-based strategies, training, and institutional resources to use social media to communicate evidence. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Research; Social Media

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24907363     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  5 in total

1.  The Impact of Social Media on Dissemination and Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Longitudinal Observational Study.

Authors:  Pushpa Narayanaswami; Gary Gronseth; Richard Dubinsky; Rebecca Penfold-Murray; Julie Cox; Christopher Bever; Yolanda Martins; Carol Rheaume; Denise Shouse; Thomas S D Getchius
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Mutual Distrust: Perspectives From Researchers and Policy Makers on the Research to Policy Gap in 2013 and Recommendations for the Future.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Jane W Seymour; Maximilian J Pany; Adeline Goss; Zachary F Meisel; David Grande
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  The unbearable emptiness of tweeting-About journal articles.

Authors:  Nicolas Robinson-Garcia; Rodrigo Costas; Kimberley Isett; Julia Melkers; Diana Hicks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Online Dissemination Strategies of a Canada Research Chair: Overview and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Jessica Hébert; Hubert Robitaille; Stéphane Turcotte; France Légaré
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-02-24

5.  Beyond Journals-Visual Abstracts Promote Wider Suicide Prevention Research Dissemination and Engagement: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Adam S Hoffberg; Joe Huggins; Audrey Cobb; Jeri E Forster; Nazanin Bahraini
Journal:  Front Res Metr Anal       Date:  2020-10-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.