Literature DB >> 24907031

Prenatal screening for intimate partner violence: a qualitative meta-synthesis.

Jenna A LoGiudice1.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this meta-synthesis was to glean an understanding of healthcare providers' experience with prenatal screening for intimate partner violence (IPV).
BACKGROUND: Prenatal screening guidelines for IPV are in place; however, a gap exists between these recommendations and providers' practices.
METHODS: Noblit and Hare's (1988) approach to synthesizing qualitative research studies was utilized. Eight research reports were identified and produced a sample of 142 experienced women's healthcare providers from the United States, New Zealand, and Sweden.
RESULTS: The synthesis revealed five overarching themes: (1) therapeutic relationship, (2) understanding what she is not saying, (3) presence of partner, (4) variations of how and when to discuss, and (5) "lost in the maze" of disclosure. When analyzed as a whole, the five themes contribute to a lack of universal screening for IPV.
CONCLUSIONS: Given that IPV is a social problem with long-term negative sequela, providers are poised to identify women during the perinatal timeframe to ensure adequate referrals and services to stop the cycle of violence.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intimate partner violence; Meta-synthesis; Prenatal screening; Women's healthcare providers

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24907031     DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2014.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Nurs Res        ISSN: 0897-1897            Impact factor:   2.257


  7 in total

1.  Reproductive coercion, sexual risk behaviours and mental health symptoms among young low-income behaviourally bisexual women: implications for nursing practice.

Authors:  Kamila A Alexander; Ellen M Volpe; Sarah Abboud; Jacquelyn C Campbell
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.036

2.  Community Perspectives of Complex Trauma Assessment for Aboriginal Parents: 'Its Important, but How These Discussions Are Held Is Critical'.

Authors:  Catherine Chamberlain; Graham Gee; Deirdre Gartland; Fiona K Mensah; Sarah Mares; Yvonne Clark; Naomi Ralph; Caroline Atkinson; Tanja Hirvonen; Helen McLachlan; Tahnia Edwards; Helen Herrman; Stephanie J Brown; And Jan M Nicholson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-09-15

3.  Who is Being Screened for Intimate Partner Violence in Primary Care Settings? Secondary Data Analysis of a Cluster Randomised Trial.

Authors:  Leesa Hooker; Angela Taft
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-05-05

4.  'It is a difficult topic' - a qualitative study of midwives´ experiences with routine antenatal enquiry for intimate partner violence.

Authors:  L Henriksen; L M Garnweidner-Holme; K K Thorsteinsen; M Lukasse
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Training medical students: victim's perceptions of selectively screening women for intimate partner violence in health care settings.

Authors:  Olufunmilayo I Fawole; Busola O Balogun; Adebola A Adejimi; O J Akinsola; Jacqueline M Van Wyk
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Health practitioners' readiness to address domestic violence and abuse: A qualitative meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Kelsey Hegarty; Gemma McKibbin; Mohajer Hameed; Jane Koziol-McLain; Gene Feder; Laura Tarzia; Leesa Hooker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Health practitioners' perceptions of structural barriers to the identification of intimate partner abuse: a qualitative meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Naomi Hudspeth; Jacqui Cameron; Surriya Baloch; Laura Tarzia; Kelsey Hegarty
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.