Literature DB >> 24907002

Multiple-group analysis approach to testing group difference in indirect effects.

Ehri Ryu1.   

Abstract

This article introduces five methods that take a multiple-group analysis approach to testing a group difference in indirect effects. Unlike the general frameworks for testing moderated indirect effects, the five methods provide direct tests for equality of indirect effects between groups. A simulation study was conducted to examine the performance of the methods in terms of the empirical type I error rate, statistical power, and coverage of 95 % confidence intervals. The likelihood ratio test and percentile bootstrap confidence intervals are recommended. The methods are illustrated using an empirical data set.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24907002     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0485-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  4 in total

1.  Caregiving Subgroups Differences in the Associations Between the Resilience Resources and Life Satisfaction.

Authors:  Seungyoun Kim; Bob G Knight
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2016-09-20

2.  Comparing Indirect Effects in Different Groups in Single-Group and Multi-Group Structural Equation Models.

Authors:  Ehri Ryu; Jeewon Cheong
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-11

3.  Moderated Role of Social Support in the Relationship between Job Strain, Burnout, and Organizational Commitment among Operating Room Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Na Li; Lichuan Zhang; Xuejing Li; Qian Lu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  The Power of Choice: A Study Protocol on How Identity Leadership Fosters Commitment Toward the Organization.

Authors:  Mafalda F Mascarenhas; Felix Dübbers; Magdalena Hoszowska; Aylin Köseoğlu; Ralitsa Karakasheva; Ayse B Topal; David Izydorczyk; Jérémy E Lemoine
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.