| Literature DB >> 24906843 |
Adrian Münscher1, Susanne Sehner, Jegane Taleh, Silke Tribius, Nicolaus Möckelmann, Arne Böttcher, Amit Gulati, Carsten Dalchow, Till Clauditz, Rainald Knecht.
Abstract
We discuss the clinical effectiveness and predictive value of routine panendoscopy for surveillance and follow-up of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Retrospective comparative study. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Two hundred and four HNSCC patients (follow-up between 2004 and 2007) were retrospectively evaluated. During follow-up, panendoscopy was performed routinely once a year. To avoid unnecessary procedures, we evaluated the value of radiological and clinical parameters in follow-up. On comparing normal-computerized tomography (CT) vs. abnormal CT results, a 13-fold higher frequency of recurrence (odds ratio 12.74; 95% CI 4.22, 38.48; p < 0.001) was found. Additionally, patient medical history, clinical investigation, and recurrence pattern were significant parameters when detecting a possible recurrence. Panendoscopy could have been avoided in 40% of patients with HNSCC (173/432). A follow-up schedule avoiding routine panendoscopy in HNSCC follow-up when the combination of diagnostic parameters is satisfactory does not influence the sensitivity or specificity of the test.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24906843 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3125-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 0937-4477 Impact factor: 2.503