BACKGROUND: Adhesions and poor healing are complications of flexor tendon repair. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to investigate a tissue engineering approach to improve functional outcomes after flexor tendon repair in a canine model. METHODS: Flexor digitorum profundus tendons were lacerated and repaired in 60 dogs that were followed for 10, 21, or 42 days. One randomly selected repair from either the second or fifth digit in one paw in each dog was treated with carbodiimide-derivatized hyaluronic acid, gelatin, and lubricin plus autologous bone marrow stromal cells stimulated with growth and differentiation factor 5; control repair tendons were not treated. Digits were analyzed by adhesion score, work of flexion, tendon-pulley friction, failure force, and histology. RESULTS: In the control group, 35 of 52 control tendons had adhesions, whereas 19 of 49 treated tendons had adhesions. The number of repaired tendons with adhesions in the control group was greater than the number in the treated group at all three times (p = 0.005). The normalized work of flexion in treated tendons was 0.28 (± 0.08), 0.29 (± 0.19), and 0.32 (± 0.22) N/mm/° at Day 10, Day 21, and Day 42 respectively, compared with the untreated tendons of 0.46 (± 0.19) at Day 10 (effect size, 1.5; p = 0.01), 0.77 (± 0.49) at Day 21 (effect size, 1.4; p < 0.001), and 1.17 (± 0.82) N/mm/° at Day 42 (effect size, 1.6; p < 0.001). The friction data were comparable to the work of flexion data at all times. The repaired tendon failure force in the untreated group at 42 days was 70.2 N (± 8.77), which was greater than the treated tendons 44.7 N (± 8.53) (effect size, 1.9; p < 0.001). Histologically, treated repairs had a smooth surface with intrinsic healing, whereas control repairs had surface adhesions and extrinsic healing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence that tissue engineering coupled with restoration of tendon gliding can improve the quality of tendon healing in a large animal in vivo model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tissue engineering may enhance intrinsic tendon healing and thus improve the functional outcomes of flexor tendon repair.
BACKGROUND: Adhesions and poor healing are complications of flexor tendon repair. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to investigate a tissue engineering approach to improve functional outcomes after flexor tendon repair in a canine model. METHODS: Flexor digitorum profundus tendons were lacerated and repaired in 60 dogs that were followed for 10, 21, or 42 days. One randomly selected repair from either the second or fifth digit in one paw in each dog was treated with carbodiimide-derivatized hyaluronic acid, gelatin, and lubricin plus autologous bone marrow stromal cells stimulated with growth and differentiation factor 5; control repair tendons were not treated. Digits were analyzed by adhesion score, work of flexion, tendon-pulley friction, failure force, and histology. RESULTS: In the control group, 35 of 52 control tendons had adhesions, whereas 19 of 49 treated tendons had adhesions. The number of repaired tendons with adhesions in the control group was greater than the number in the treated group at all three times (p = 0.005). The normalized work of flexion in treated tendons was 0.28 (± 0.08), 0.29 (± 0.19), and 0.32 (± 0.22) N/mm/° at Day 10, Day 21, and Day 42 respectively, compared with the untreated tendons of 0.46 (± 0.19) at Day 10 (effect size, 1.5; p = 0.01), 0.77 (± 0.49) at Day 21 (effect size, 1.4; p < 0.001), and 1.17 (± 0.82) N/mm/° at Day 42 (effect size, 1.6; p < 0.001). The friction data were comparable to the work of flexion data at all times. The repaired tendon failure force in the untreated group at 42 days was 70.2 N (± 8.77), which was greater than the treated tendons 44.7 N (± 8.53) (effect size, 1.9; p < 0.001). Histologically, treated repairs had a smooth surface with intrinsic healing, whereas control repairs had surface adhesions and extrinsic healing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence that tissue engineering coupled with restoration of tendon gliding can improve the quality of tendon healing in a large animal in vivo model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tissue engineering may enhance intrinsic tendon healing and thus improve the functional outcomes of flexor tendon repair.
Authors: Tiziana Martinello; Ilaria Bronzini; Anna Perazzi; Stefania Testoni; Gulia Maria De Benedictis; Alessandro Negro; Giovanni Caporale; Francesco Mascarello; Ilaria Iacopetti; Marco Patruno Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Chunfeng Zhao; Yu-Long Sun; Gregory D Jay; Steven L Moran; Kai-Nan An; Peter C Amadio Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Chunfeng Zhao; Hsiao-Feng Chieh; Karim Bakri; Jun Ikeda; Yu-Long Sun; Steven L Moran; Kai-Nan An; Peter C Amadio Journal: Med Eng Phys Date: 2009-09-06 Impact factor: 2.242
Authors: Chunfeng Zhao; Yasuhiro Ozasa; Haruhiko Shimura; Ramona L Reisdorf; Andrew R Thoreson; Gregory Jay; Steven L Moran; Kai-Nan An; Peter C Amadio Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Richard H Gelberman; Stephen W Linderman; Rohith Jayaram; Anna D Dikina; Shelly Sakiyama-Elbert; Eben Alsberg; Stavros Thomopoulos; Hua Shen Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Benjamin R Freedman; Andreas Kuttler; Nicolau Beckmann; Sungmin Nam; Daniel Kent; Michael Schuleit; Farshad Ramazani; Nathalie Accart; Anna Rock; Jianyu Li; Markus Kurz; Andreas Fisch; Thomas Ullrich; Michael W Hast; Yann Tinguely; Eckhard Weber; David J Mooney Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2022-01-03 Impact factor: 29.234
Authors: Richard H Gelberman; Hua Shen; Ioannis Kormpakis; Benjamin Rothrauff; Guang Yang; Rocky S Tuan; Younan Xia; Shelly Sakiyama-Elbert; Matthew J Silva; Stavros Thomopoulos Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Jolanta B Norelli; Dawid P Plaza; Drew N Stal; Anish M Varghese; Haixiang Liang; Daniel A Grande Journal: J Tissue Eng Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 7.813