A Kwetkat1, T Lehmann, A Wittrich. 1. Klinik für Geriatrie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Bachstr. 18, 07743, Jena, Deutschland, anja.kwetkat@med.uni-jena.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physicians in Germany who are not specialized in geriatric medicine often have to make decisions regarding referral of patients for early geriatric rehabilitation. The risk of inadequate patient allocation is due to lack of knowledge or underestimation of the potential benefit of early rehabilitation in reducing a patient's need of care. Particularly the oldest old are affected by those inadequate decisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the nationwide database Gemidas Pro, the data sets of ≥ 90-year-old patients were analysed regarding diagnoses, multimorbidity, gender, length of stay, procedures, outcome parameters as nursing personnel regulation (PPR), Barthel index and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test compared to younger age groups. Data from 85 acute inpatient geriatric institutions during the period from January 2006 to December 2009 were included. RESULTS: Neither the analysis of the diagnosis nor multimorbidity showed relevant differences compared to younger patients. Despite poorer functional status at admission, the ≥ 90 year olds experienced a 25 % increase in the activities of daily living (ADL) measured by PPR, 30 % increase in mobility classification based on the TUG and 59 % increase in ADL measured with the Barthel index. These changes were significantly different. In addition, the length of stay was 18.96 days on average in the group of ≥ 90-year-old patients, which was but not significantly shorter than the length of stay in the group of 70- to 79-year-old (19.7 days) and 80- to 89-year-old patients (19.65 days). CONCLUSION: The analyses show that the oldest old suffer from more severe deficits in functional status on admission in acute geriatric wards compared to younger patient groups. However, on discharge the oldest old show a significant and relevant increase in mobility and ADL without increase in length of stay.
BACKGROUND: Physicians in Germany who are not specialized in geriatric medicine often have to make decisions regarding referral of patients for early geriatric rehabilitation. The risk of inadequate patient allocation is due to lack of knowledge or underestimation of the potential benefit of early rehabilitation in reducing a patient's need of care. Particularly the oldest old are affected by those inadequate decisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the nationwide database Gemidas Pro, the data sets of ≥ 90-year-old patients were analysed regarding diagnoses, multimorbidity, gender, length of stay, procedures, outcome parameters as nursing personnel regulation (PPR), Barthel index and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test compared to younger age groups. Data from 85 acute inpatient geriatric institutions during the period from January 2006 to December 2009 were included. RESULTS: Neither the analysis of the diagnosis nor multimorbidity showed relevant differences compared to younger patients. Despite poorer functional status at admission, the ≥ 90 year olds experienced a 25 % increase in the activities of daily living (ADL) measured by PPR, 30 % increase in mobility classification based on the TUG and 59 % increase in ADL measured with the Barthel index. These changes were significantly different. In addition, the length of stay was 18.96 days on average in the group of ≥ 90-year-old patients, which was but not significantly shorter than the length of stay in the group of 70- to 79-year-old (19.7 days) and 80- to 89-year-old patients (19.65 days). CONCLUSION: The analyses show that the oldest old suffer from more severe deficits in functional status on admission in acute geriatric wards compared to younger patient groups. However, on discharge the oldest old show a significant and relevant increase in mobility and ADL without increase in length of stay.
Authors: G Kolb; K Breuninger; S Gronemeyer; D van den Heuvel; N Lübke; D Lüttje; A Wittrich; J Wolff Journal: Z Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 1.281
Authors: Juan J Baztán; Francisco M Suárez-García; Jesús López-Arrieta; Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas; Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-01-22
Authors: M Palzer; U Meyer; L A Abderhalden; A Gazzotti; C Hierholzer; H A Bischoff-Ferrari; G Freystätter Journal: Z Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 1.281