Literature DB >> 24906244

Expectation of volunteers towards the vaccine efficacy of the prime-boost HIV vaccine phase III trial during unblinding.

Kessuda Khowsroy1, Jittima Dhitavat, Yupa Sabmee, Pataramon Laowarakul, Jutarat Wattanakitwichai, Jiraporn Auetian, Kannika Lothong, Roongtip Boondao, Sarawan Maythaarttaphong, Sunee Yaemwong, Jean-Louis Excler, Supachai Rerks-Ngarm, Punnee Pitisuttithum.   

Abstract

A Phase III community-based HIV vaccine trial using the ALVAC-HIV and AIDSVAX B/E prime-boost regimen (RV144) showed a modest vaccine efficacy of 31.2% against HIV acquisition. Participant's understanding of the trial is a key element of its success. This study aimed to understand participant's expectation and response to the overall results of the trial as well after unblinding. Using an open-ended questionnaire, data were collected from 400 participants who came for the unblinding visit. Fifty-three percent received the vaccine and 47% were placebo recipients. The median age was 30 years (range: 22-37). The observed vaccine efficacy of 31.2% was lower than expected by 67.75% of participants compared to higher than expected (by 6%), as expected (by 11.25%), and those with no expectation (15%). A majority of participants (71.5%) were happy and proud, and indicated that it was a good result. The rest were sad or disappointed (22.75%) or acquiescent (5.75%). After unblinding, 67.92% of the vaccine recipients had a positive response and 32.08% were acquiescent. Among placebo recipients, 85.11% were acquiescent and 10.11% indicated that being assigned to the vaccine group would have been better even though vaccine efficacy was only 31.2%. Despite the modest vaccine efficacy, a majority of study participants acknowledged the value of the trial and hoped that information from RV144 could be used for future vaccine development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24906244      PMCID: PMC4208557          DOI: 10.1089/AID.2013.0136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses        ISSN: 0889-2229            Impact factor:   2.205


  16 in total

1.  HIV prevention research in a resource-limited setting: the experience of planning a trial in Cambodia.

Authors:  Kimberly Page-Shafer; Vonthanak Saphonn; Ly Penh Sun; Mean Chhi Vun; David A Cooper; John M Kaldor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Towards a science of community engagement.

Authors:  Peter A Newman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Beyond the checklist: assessing understanding for HIV vaccine trial participation in South Africa.

Authors:  Graham Lindegger; Cecilia Milford; Catherine Slack; Michael Quayle; Xolani Xaba; Eftyhia Vardas
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.731

4.  Offering participants results of a clinical trial: sharing results of a negative study.

Authors:  Ann H Partridge; Julia S Wong; Katherine Knudsen; Rebecca Gelman; Ebonie Sampson; Michele Gadd; Karyn L Bishop; Jay R Harris; Eric P Winer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Mar 12-18       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  K Featherstone; J L Donovan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

6.  Why do people cooperate with medical research? Findings from three studies.

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods; Carolyn Tarrant
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Disclosure challenges among people living with HIV in Thailand.

Authors:  Sung-Jae Lee; Li Li; Sopon Iamsirithaworn; Siwaporn Khumtong
Journal:  Int J Nurs Pract       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.066

8.  Efficacy assessment of a cell-mediated immunity HIV-1 vaccine (the Step Study): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, test-of-concept trial.

Authors:  Susan P Buchbinder; Devan V Mehrotra; Ann Duerr; Daniel W Fitzgerald; Robin Mogg; David Li; Peter B Gilbert; Javier R Lama; Michael Marmor; Carlos Del Rio; M Juliana McElrath; Danilo R Casimiro; Keith M Gottesdiener; Jeffrey A Chodakewitz; Lawrence Corey; Michael N Robertson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  "Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it?" The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Katie Featherstone; Jenny L Donovan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions.

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  3 in total

1.  First Phase I human clinical trial of a killed whole-HIV-1 vaccine: demonstration of its safety and enhancement of anti-HIV antibody responses.

Authors:  Eunsil Choi; Chad J Michalski; Seung Ho Choo; Gyoung Nyoun Kim; Elizabeth Banasikowska; Sangkyun Lee; Kunyu Wu; Hwa-Yong An; Anthony Mills; Stefan Schneider; U Fritz Bredeek; Daniel R Coulston; Shilei Ding; Andrés Finzi; Meijuan Tian; Katja Klein; Eric J Arts; Jamie F S Mann; Yong Gao; C Yong Kang
Journal:  Retrovirology       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.602

Review 2.  Killed whole-HIV vaccine; employing a well established strategy for antiviral vaccines.

Authors:  C Yong Kang; Yong Gao
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.250

3.  Stakeholder engagement to inform HIV clinical trials: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Suzanne Day; Meredith Blumberg; Thi Vu; Yang Zhao; Stuart Rennie; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.396

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.