Literature DB >> 24906028

Application of supernodal sparse factorization and inversion to the estimation of (co)variance components by residual maximum likelihood.

Y Masuda1, T Baba, M Suzuki.   

Abstract

We demonstrated that supernodal techniques were more efficient than traditional methods for factorization and inversion of a coefficient matrix of mixed model equations (MME), which are often required in residual maximum likelihood (REML). Supernodal left-looking and inverse multifrontal algorithms were employed for sparse factorization and inversion, respectively. The approximate minimum degree or multilevel nested dissection was used for ordering. A new computer package, Yet Another MME Solver (YAMS), was developed and compared with FSPAK with respect to computing time and size of temporary memory for 13 test matrices. The matrices were produced by fitting animal models to dairy data and by using simulations from sire, sire-maternal grand sire, maternal and dominance models for phenotypic data and animal model for genomic data. The order of matrices ranged from 32,840 to 1,048,872. The YAMS software factorized and inverted the matrices up to 13 and 10 times faster than FSPAK, respectively, when an appropriate ordering strategy was applied. The YAMS package required at most 282 MB and 512 MB of temporary memory for factorization and inversion, respectively. Processing time per iteration in average information REML was reduced, using YAMS. The YAMS package is freely available on request by contacting the corresponding author.
© 2013 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computing methods; mixed model equations; residual maximum likelihood; sparse matrix

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24906028     DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  6 in total

1.  DAIRRy-BLUP: a high-performance computing approach to genomic prediction.

Authors:  Arne De Coninck; Jan Fostier; Steven Maenhout; Bernard De Baets
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A new approach fits multivariate genomic prediction models efficiently.

Authors:  Alencar Xavier; David Habier
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 5.100

3.  Emerging issues in genomic selection.

Authors:  Ignacy Misztal; Ignacio Aguilar; Daniela Lourenco; Li Ma; Juan Pedro Steibel; Miguel Toro
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Is single-step genomic REML with the algorithm for proven and young more computationally efficient when less generations of data are present?

Authors:  Vinícius Silva Junqueira; Daniela Lourenco; Yutaka Masuda; Fernando Flores Cardoso; Paulo Sávio Lopes; Fabyano Fonseca E Silva; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.338

5.  A fast indirect method to compute functions of genomic relationships concerning genotyped and ungenotyped individuals, for diversity management.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Colleau; Isabelle Palhière; Silvia T Rodríguez-Ramilo; Andres Legarra
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Spatial modelling improves genetic evaluation in smallholder breeding programs.

Authors:  Maria L Selle; Ingelin Steinsland; Owen Powell; John M Hickey; Gregor Gorjanc
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.297

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.