| Literature DB >> 24904545 |
Anna Hanke1, Emmo Hamann1, Ritin Sharma2, Jeanine S Geelhoed1, Theresa Hargesheimer1, Beate Kraft1, Volker Meyer1, Sabine Lenk1, Harald Osmers1, Rong Wu3, Kofi Makinwa3, Robert L Hettich2, Jillian F Banfield4, Halina E Tegetmeyer5, Marc Strous6.
Abstract
Sandy coastal sediments are global hotspots for microbial mineralization of organic matter and denitrification. These sediments are characterized by advective porewater flow, tidal cycling and an active and complex microbial community. Metagenomic sequencing of microbial communities sampled from such sediments showed that potential sulfur oxidizing Gammaproteobacteria and members of the enigmatic BD1-5/SN-2 candidate phylum were abundant in situ (>10% and ~2% respectively). By mimicking the dynamic oxic/anoxic environmental conditions of the sediment in a laboratory chemostat, a simplified microbial community was selected from the more complex inoculum. Metagenomics, proteomics and fluorescence in situ hybridization showed that this simplified community contained both a potential sulfur oxidizing Gammaproteobacteria (at 24 ± 2% abundance) and a member of the BD1-5/SN-2 candidate phylum (at 7 ± 6% abundance). Despite the abundant supply of organic substrates to the chemostat, proteomic analysis suggested that the selected gammaproteobacterium grew partially autotrophically and performed hydrogen/formate oxidation. The enrichment of a member of the BD1-5/SN-2 candidate phylum enabled, for the first time, direct microscopic observation by fluorescent in situ hybridization and the experimental validation of the previously predicted translation of the stop codon UGA into glycine.Entities:
Keywords: Maritimibacter; Roseobacter; chemostat; continuous culture; enrichment; stop codon
Year: 2014 PMID: 24904545 PMCID: PMC4032931 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00231
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Medium composition for continuous cultures.
| 33.4 g/l | Red sea | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| NaNO3 | 1 | Roth | |
| NaNO2 | 20 | Roth | |
| Carbon (see below) | 30.5 | – | |
| KH2PO4 | 500 | Roth | |
| FeSO4*7H2O | 10.755 | Roth | |
| CuCl2 | 1.256 | Roth | |
| ZnCl2 | 0.051 | Roth | |
| MnCl2*4H2O | 0.051 | AppliChem | |
| H3BO3 | 0.097 | Roth | |
| CoCl2*6H2O | 0.05 | Roth | |
| NiCl2*6H2O | 0.011 | Roth | |
| Na2MoO4*2H2O | 0.011 | Roth | |
| AlCl3*6H2O | 0.01 | AppliChem | |
| Glucose | 44.1 | AppliChem | |
| Acetate | 7.6 | AppliChem | |
| Amino acids (see below) | 48.3 | – | |
| – | |||
| Glutamic acid | 10.7 | AppliChem | |
| Aspartic acid | 11.7 | Roth | |
| Alanine | 8.5 | AppliChem | |
| Serine | 4.6 | AppliChem | |
| Tyrosine | 8.9 | AppliChem | |
| Histidine | 1.4 | AppliChem | |
| Methionine | 2.4 | AppliChem |
Note that the actual substrate concentrations inside the chemostat were much lower because the influent medium was diluted dropwise into the culture vessel.
Figure 1The chemostat vessel used, photo (A) and schematic (B). All additions and withdrawals were made from the top of the vessel. The vessel was mixed by recycling gas from the headspace to the bottom via a sintered glass filter. The culture volume was measured via the vessel weight by a load cell mounted underneath the vessel. Medium was added via a glass back growth buffer to prevent contamination of the influent medium tubing.
Characteristics and metabolism of the binnable populations at .
| Abundance (binning) | (%) | 25.9 | 21.7 | 12.5 | 22.3 | 11.2 |
| Abundance (proteome) | (%) | 32.9 | 25.9 | 13.2 | 25.2 | 2.8 |
| Abundance ( | (%) | 0.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 12.1 | 1.9 |
| GC content | (%) | 62.3 | 55.9 | 56.9 | 50.2 | 33.2 |
| Bin size | (Mb) | 3.7 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 3.3 |
| Internal overlap | (%) | 2.7 | 1 | 12.2 | 3.2 | 37.2 |
| Number of tRNAs | (#) | 43 | 38 | 63 | 50 | 76 |
| Genome completeness | (#/#) | 122/139 | 133/139 | 105/139 | 135/139 | 109/139 |
| Estimated genome size | (Mb) | 3.6 | 3.5 | 4.4 | 3.9 | 2.1 |
| Number of contigs | (#) | 163 | 429 | 4597 | 248 | 2747 |
| N50 contig length | (kb) | 120 | 20 | 1.4 | 42 | 1.6 |
| Ribosomal proteins (64) | (#) | 10 (25 ± 5x) | 12 (21 ± 7x) | 4 (18 ± 9x) | 48 (33 ± 6x) | 27 (27 ± 12x) |
| Cell division and growth (30) | (#) | 23 (48 ± 9x) | 23 (40 ± 7x) | 14 (38 ± 10x) | 25 (38 ± 8x) | 12 (21 ± 14x) |
| tRNA metabolism (34) | (#) | 27 (21 ± 4x) | 26 (20 ± 5x) | 12 (18 ± 9x) | 28 (16 ± 4x) | 6 (10 ± 5x) |
| F0F1 ATP synthase (7) | (#) | 7 (46 ± 10x) | 7 (45 ± 5x) | 2 (15 ± 1x) | 6 (42 ± 4x) | 2 (23 ± 1x) |
| Complex I (11) | (#) | 8 (37 ± 6x) | 5 (35 ± 3x) | 8 (24 ± 11x) | 6 (21 ± 6x) | n.d. |
| Complex IV (4) | (#) | 3 (39 ± 9x) | 3 (37 ± 4x) | 3 (26 ± 14x) | 2 (43 ± 5x) | n.d. |
| Oxygen stress (11) | (#) | 6 (30 ± 13x) | 5 (22 ± 10) | 4 (40 ± 8) | 10 (46 ± 7x) | 6 (18 ± 16x) |
| Nitrate reductase (3) | (#) | n.d. | 1 (49 ± 3x) | 1 (48 ± 2x) | 3 (46 ± 6x) | n.d. |
| Nitrite reductase (1) | (#) | 1 (44 ± 24x) | 1 (44 ± 18x) | n.d. | 1 (29 ± 32x) | n.d. |
| Nitric oxide reductase (1) | (#) | 1 (44 ± 0x) | 1 (44 ± 4x) | n.d. | 1 (37 ± 8x) | n.d. |
| Nitrous oxide reductase (1) | (#) | 1 (58 ± 3) | 1 (49 ± 1x) | 1 (60 ± 13x) | 1 (66 ± 1x) | n.d. |
| Sulfide oxidation (13) | (#) | 1 (51 ± 10x) | n.d. | n.d. | 13 (36 ± 12x) | n.d. |
| Hydrogen oxidation (4) | (#) | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 3 (27 ± 3x) | n.d. |
| Formate oxidation (5) | (#) | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 5 (26 ± 5x) | n.d. |
| CO dehydrogenase (3) | (#) | 3 (49 ± 16x) | n.d. | 3 (40 ± 4x) | n.d. | n.d. |
| Calvin Cycle (3) | (#) | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 3 (7 ± 1) | n.d. |
| Citric acid cycle (23) | (#) | 16 (39 ± 7x) | 15 (35 ± 5x) | 13 (36 ± 8x) | 17 (33 ± 5x) | n.d. |
| Sugar metabolism (24) | (#) | 18 (44 ± 7x) | 14 (35 ± 5x) | 9 (28 ± 9x) | 11 (29 ± 4x) | n.d. |
| Amino acid metabolism (44) | (#) | 30 (28 ± 7x) | 32 (26 ± 11x) | 26 (26 ± 9x) | 30 (26 ± 8x) | 4 (11 ± 8x) |
| Sugars (9) | (#) | 6 (28 ± 7x) | 3 (32 ± 7x) | 6 (26 ± 5x) | 2 (15 ± 16x) | n.d. |
| Aminoacids (7) | (#) | 5 (34 ± 11x) | 4 (59 ± 5x) | 3 (19 ± 4x) | 3 (46 ± 16x) | n.d. |
| Di/tricarboxylates (4) | (#) | 4 (40 ± 14x) | 4 (42 ± 10x) | 3 (31 ± 15x) | 2 (16 ± 17x) | n.d. |
| Glycine-betaine (4) | (#) | 2 (36 ± 5x) | 1 (46 ± 11x) | 2 (30 ± 3x) | 1 (44 ± 1x) | n.d. |
| Oligopeptides (3) | (#) | 2 (31 ± 5x) | 2 (32 ± 16x) | 2 (33 ± 6x) | 1 (19 ± 6x) | n.d. |
| Purines (1) | (#) | 1 (55 ± 16x) | 1 (65 ± 2x) | 1 (61 ± 1x) | n.d. | n.d. |
| Acetate (1) | (#) | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 1 (13 ± 1x) | n.d. |
| Urea (1) | (#) | n.d. | 1 (42 ± 5x) | 1 (30 ± 4x) | 0 | n.d. |
| Transporters total (29) | (#) | 25 | 23 | 24 | 13 | 0 |
Oligonucleotide probes used for FISH analyses in this study.
| BD1207 | 40 | BD1-5 member | AGCCCCAGACGTAAAAGC | This study |
| Gam42a | 35 | Gammaproteobacteria | GCCTTCCCACATCGTTT | Manz et al., |
| Bet42a unl. | 35 | Betaproteobacteria | GCCTTCCCACTTCGTTT | Manz et al., |
| Alf968 | 35 | Alphaproteobacteria | GGTAAGGTTCTGCGCGTT | Neef, |
| Eub338 | 35 | Eubacteria | GCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGT | Amann et al., |
| Eub338-II | 35 | Eubacteria | GCAGCCACCCGTAGGTGT | Daims et al., |
| Eub338-III | 35 | Eubacteria | GCTGCCACCCGTAGGTGT | Daims et al., |
| Non338 | 35 | Negative control | ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGC | Wallner et al., |
unl, unlabeled (competitor to Gam42a); FA, formamide concentration (v/v) in the hybridization buffer.
Figure 2Oxygen dosage (A), temperature and heater power (B), and pH control (C) enabling dynamic “tidal” conditions for selection of the microbial community in the chemostat during 28 days. The response of the culture to the intermittent oxygen supply is clearly visible in the redox sensor (A, ORP) response. The maintenance of several mbar overpressure (D) indicated the absence of undesired air leaks. The ammonium concentration in the culture vessel (measured off-line) is also shown in (D). The response of the nitrite and nitrate concentrations to tidal cycling is shown in the inset of (A) for day 15.
Figure 3GC vs. coverage plot showing scattering of the contigs into distinct “clouds,” each associated with a different bin. Bins were obtained independent of coverage data with a combination of tetranucleotide compositional analysis and interpolated markov modeling. The distribution of best blast hits over reference organisms is shown for four of the five bins. For C, the distribution was very similar to that of bin B. Because no phylogenetically close reference organisms were present in the database for Bin D and E, many contigs of these bins did not give a blast hit.
Figure 4Phylogenetic analysis of the full length ribosomal 16S rRNA genes reconstructed from the metagenome reads sampled after 23 days of selection (blue). Closed circles indicate bootstrap values of >95%, half open circles indicate bootstrap values of >90%. Potential sulfur oxidizing Gammaproteobacteria previously detected by Lenk et al. (2011) are shown in purple.
Comparison of population abundances for the selected microbial community (based on metagenomics/FISH) and the sediment community composition .
| Gammaproteobacteria | 24.6 | 19–25 |
| Flavobacteria | 10.2 | n.d. |
| Cyanobacteria | 10.1 | n.d. |
| Deltaproteobacteria | 9.0 | n.d. |
| Eukaryoata | 5.7 | n.d. |
| Planctomycetes | 4.8 | n.d. |
| Actinobacteria | 4.1 | n.d. |
| Alphaproteobacteria | 3.9 | 47–72 |
| Acidobacteria | 3.7 | n.d. |
| Sphingobacteria | 3.1 | n.d. |
| Verrucomicrobia | 2.8 | n.d. |
| Cytophagia | 1.9 | n.d. |
| BD1-5/SN-2 | 1.9 | 1.4–11 |
| Chloroflexi | 1.4 | n.d. |
| Others | 12.8 | n.d. |
12.1% were affiliated with potential sulfur oxidizing gammaproteobacteria.
Figure 5Prediction of the genetic code used by the BD1-5/SN-2 population. The results are shown for Bin E (A), E. coli (B), and Mycoplasma (C). Directly above each codon, the canonical translation is shown (*indicates a stop codon). The frequency of amino acids observed in conserved positions of conserved proteins is visualized as a WebLogo, where the height of each letter is a measure for the observed frequency (most frequent amino acid shown at the top). The frequencies were normalized to the expected occurrence of the codon predicted from the percentage GC (shaded area). The UGA stop codon (red arrow) was correctly predicted for E. coli (stop) and Mycoplasma (tryptophan, W) and was predicted to be translated as glycine for the enriched BD1-5/SN-2 bacterium.
Figure 6Fluorescence Scale bar = 1 μm.