| Literature DB >> 24903710 |
Raymond N Tabue1, Thomas Nem, Jean Atangana, Jude D Bigoga, Salomon Patchoke, Frédéric Tchouine, Barrière Y Fodjo, Rose G F Leke, Etienne Fondjo.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malaria transmission in Cameroon is mediated by a plethora of vectors that are heterogeneously distributed across the country depending on the biotope. To effectively guide malaria control operations, regular update on the role of local Anopheles species is essential. Therefore, an entomological survey was conducted between August 2010 and May 2011 to evaluate the role of the local anopheline population in malaria transmission in three villages of the Ndop health district in the northwest region of Cameroon where malaria is holoendemic, as a means to acquiring evidence based data for improved vector intervention.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24903710 PMCID: PMC4055171 DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-262
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Figure 1Map of Ndop Health District showing the location of the study sites.
Composition of the Culicine fauna in Backyit, Mbafuh and Mbapishi
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 104 | 144 | 380 | 644 | 217 | 8 | 55 | 1552 | 12.05% | |
| 16 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 72 | 109 | 0.85% | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0.06% | |
| 1763 | 877 | 841 | 408 | 410 | 236 | 765 | 5300 | 41.14% | |
| 264 | 1101 | 1360 | 1357 | 338 | 370 | 1124 | 5914 | 45.91% | |
| Total | 2147 | 2136 | 2581 | 2414 | 966 | 621 | 2018 | 12883 | 100.00% |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 11 | 150 | 366 | 379 | 241 | 9 | 12 | 1168 | 10.23% | |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.02% | |
| 2 | 6 | 16 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 40 | 0.35% | |
| 204 | 117 | 93 | 50 | 195 | 8 | 10 | 677 | 5.93% | |
| 992 | 1693 | 2022 | 1695 | 1265 | 416 | 1443 | 9526 | 83.47% | |
| Total | 1209 | 1967 | 2498 | 2135 | 1705 | 434 | 1465 | 11413 | 100.00% |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 96 | 237 | 375 | 237 | 233 | 54 | 20 | 1252 | 13.26% | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 0 | 4 | 12 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 23 | 0.24% | |
| 268 | 126 | 137 | 167 | 101 | 3 | 10 | 812 | 8.60% | |
| 953 | 1235 | 1110 | 1571 | 1063 | 251 | 1173 | 7356 | 77.90% | |
| Total | 1317 | 1602 | 1634 | 1976 | 1402 | 309 | 1203 | 9443 | 100.00% |
Anopheles diversity and abundance
| | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 21 | 35 | 19 | 14 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 57 | 65 | 122 (7.86%) | |
| 24 | 20 | 55 | 54 | 174 | 199 | 367 | 273 | 111 | 79 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 12 | 757 | 637 | 1394 (89.82%) | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 (0.13%) | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 11 | 29 (1.87%) | |
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 (0.06%) | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 (0.26%) | |
| 48 | 56 | 75 | 69 | 175 | 205 | 369 | 275 | 130 | 87 | 5 | 3 | 35 | 20 | 837 | 715 | 1552 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 (0.68%) | |
| 6 | 5 | 85 | 63 | 200 | 163 | 190 | 188 | 103 | 131 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 584 | 550 | 1134 (97.09%) | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 14 (1.20%) | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 (0.51%) | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 (0.43%) | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 (0.09%) | |
| 6 | 5 | 86 | 64 | 201 | 165 | 191 | 188 | 106 | 135 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 603 | 565 | 1168 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |||||||||
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 50 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 52 | 5 | 57 (4.55%) | |
| 56 | 35 | 134 | 102 | 272 | 99 | 158 | 69 | 153 | 71 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 785 | 384 | 1169 (93.37%) | |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 3 | 22 (1.76%) | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 (0.16%) | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 (0.16%) | |
| 59 | 37 | 135 | 102 | 275 | 100 | 166 | 71 | 160 | 73 | 53 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 858 | 394 | 1252 | |
Figure 2Anopheline man biting rate in Backyit, Mbafuh and Mbapishi. m.a: man biting rate, b/p/n: bites per person per night.
Variation in the Entomological Inoculation Rate (EIR) for
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 56 | 2.333 | 0.02 | 0.047 | 33 | 1.375 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0.292 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0.167 | - | - | 3 | 0.125 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0.292 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 122 | 0.726 | 0.011 | 0.008 | |
| 44 | 1.833 | 0.026 | 0.048 | 109 | 4.542 | 0 | 0 | 373 | 15.542 | 0.005 | 0.078 | 640 | 26.667 | 0.006 | 0.16 | 190 | 7.917 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.042 | 0.08 | 0.003 | 37 | 1.542 | 0.04 | 0.062 | 1394 | 8.298 | 0.007 | 0.058 | |
| 100 | 4.167 | 0.022 | 0.092 | 142 | 5.917 | 0 | 0 | 380 | 15.833 | 0.005 | 0.079 | 644 | 26.833 | 0.006 | 0.161 | 193 | 8.042 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0.333 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 49 | 2.042 | 0.03 | 0.061 | 1516 | 9.024 | 0.007 | 0.063 | |
| | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.083 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 0 | - | - | 1 | 0.042 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 5 | 0.208 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0.333 | 0 | 0 | |
| 11 | 0.458 | 0 | 0 | 148 | 6.167 | 0 | 0 | 363 | 15.125 | 0.008 | 0.121 | 378 | 15.75 | 0.005 | 0.079 | 234 | 9.75 | 0.004 | 0.039 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1134 | 6.750 | 0.005 | 0.034 | |
| 11 | 0.458 | 0 | 0 | 150 | 6.25 | 0 | 0 | 363 | 15.125 | 0.008 | 0.121 | 378 | 15.75 | 0.005 | 0.079 | 235 | 9.792 | 0.004 | 0.039 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 5 | 0.208 | 0 | 0 | 1142 | 6.798 | 0.005 | 0.034 | |
| | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 0.083 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 0 | - | - | 1 | 0.042 | - | - | 50 | 2.083 | - | - | 4 | 0.167 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 0.339 | 0 | 0 | |
| 91 | 3.792 | 0 | 0 | 236 | 9.833 | 0 | 0 | 371 | 15.458 | 0.008 | 0.124 | 227 | 9.458 | 0.004 | 0.038 | 224 | 9.333 | 0.004 | 0.037 | 4 | 0.167 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0.667 | 0 | 0 | 1169 | 6.958 | 0.004 | 0.028 | |
| 93 | 3.875 | 0 | 0 | 236 | 9.833 | 0 | 0 | 371 | 15.458 | 0.008 | 0.124 | 227 | 9.458 | 0.004 | 0.038 | 225 | 9.375 | 0.004 | 0.038 | 54 | 2.25 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0.833 | 0 | 0 | 1226 | 7.298 | 0.004 | 0.029 | |
N: number of mosquitoes collected; m.a: man biting rate (aggressivity); IR: Infection Rate; EIR: Entomological Inoculation Rate.
Figure 3An. ziemanni and An. gambiae EIR variation in Backyit, Mbafuh and Mbapishi. a. EIR variation of An. ziemanni and An. gambiae in Backyit. b - EIR variation of An. ziemanni and An. gambiae in Mbafuh. c - EIR variation of An. ziemanni and An. gambiae in Mbapishi.
Figure 4Biting behavior of in Backyit, Mbafuh and Mbapishi.