Literature DB >> 24903139

Smartphone Applications for the Clinical Oncologist in UK Practice.

Hamoun Rozati1, Sonya Pratik Shah, Neha Shah.   

Abstract

A number of medical smartphone applications have been developed to assist clinical oncology specialists. Concerns have arisen that the information provided may not be under sufficient scrutiny. This study aims to analyse the current applications available for clinical oncologists in the UK. Applications aimed specifically at physician clinical oncologists were searched for on the major smartphone operating systems: Apple iOS; Google Android; Microsoft Windows OS; and Blackberry OS. All applications were installed and analysed. The applications were scrutinised to assess the following information: cost; whether the information included was referenced; when the information was last updated; and whether they made any reference to UK guidelines. A novel rating score based on these criteria was applied to each application. Fifty applications were identified: 24 for Apple's iOS; 23 for Google's Android; 2 for Blackberry OS; and 1 for Windows OS. The categories of applications available were: drug reference; journal reference; learning; clinical calculators; decision support; guidelines; and dictionaries. Journal reference and guideline applications scored highly on our rating system. Drug reference application costs were prohibitive. Learning tools were poorly referenced and not up-to-date. Smartphones provide easy access to information. There are numerous applications devoted to oncology physicians, many of which are free and contain referenced, up-to-date data. The cost and quality of drug reference and learning applications have significant scope for improvement. A regulatory body is needed to ensure the presence of peer-reviewed, validated applications to ensure their reliability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24903139     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-014-0681-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  18 in total

1.  Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs.

Authors:  Orrin I Franko; Timothy F Tirrell
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Smartphone apps as a source of cancer information: changing trends in health information-seeking behavior.

Authors:  Ambarish Pandey; Sayeedul Hasan; Divyanshu Dubey; Sasmit Sarangi
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection.

Authors:  Joel A Wolf; Jacqueline F Moreau; Oleg Akilov; Timothy Patton; Joseph C English; Jonhan Ho; Laura K Ferris
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 4.  A systematic review of smartphone applications for chronic pain available for download in the United States.

Authors:  Lorraine S Wallace; Lara K Dhingra
Journal:  J Opioid Manag       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

5.  Reliability of real-time video smartphone for assessing National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores in acute stroke patients.

Authors:  Bart M Demaerschalk; Sravanthi Vegunta; Bert B Vargas; Qing Wu; Dwight D Channer; Joseph G Hentz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Mobile Medical Education (MoMEd) - how mobile information resources contribute to learning for undergraduate clinical students - a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Bethany S Davies; Jethin Rafique; Tim R Vincent; Jil Fairclough; Mark H Packer; Richard Vincent; Inam Haq
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Mobile medical and health apps: state of the art, concerns, regulatory control and certification.

Authors:  Maged N Kamel Boulos; Ann C Brewer; Chante Karimkhani; David B Buller; Robert P Dellavalle
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2014-02-05

Review 8.  A lot of action, but not in the right direction: systematic review and content analysis of smartphone applications for the prevention, detection, and management of cancer.

Authors:  Jacqueline Lorene Bender; Rossini Ying Kwan Yue; Matthew Jason To; Laetitia Deacken; Alejandro R Jadad
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  Do smartphone applications in healthcare require a governance and legal framework? It depends on the application!

Authors:  Esmita Charani; Enrique Castro-Sánchez; Luke S P Moore; Alison Holmes
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Evaluation of the accuracy of smartphone medical calculation apps.

Authors:  Rachel Bierbrier; Vivian Lo; Robert C Wu
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing cancer care through mobile health.

Authors:  Bassel Odeh; Reem Kayyali; Shereen Nabhani-Gebara; Nada Philip
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  A smart application for smartphone: a proposal to reduce noise pollution for people having regular tasks.

Authors:  Khaled Moustafa
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2014-08-18

3.  The multidisciplinary, theory-based co-design of a new digital health intervention supporting the care of oesophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Kristi Sun; Henry Goodfellow; Emmanouela Konstantara; Alison Hill; Debby Lennard; Elizabeth Lloyd-Dehler; Muntzer Mughal; Kathy Pritchard-Jones; Chris Robson; Elizabeth Murray
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2021-09-28

Review 4.  Expert Involvement and Adherence to Medical Evidence in Medical Mobile Phone Apps: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yousif Subhi; Sarah Hjartbro Bube; Signe Rolskov Bojsen; Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen; Lars Konge
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Medical Prognosis of Infectious Diseases in Nursing Homes by Applying Machine Learning on Clinical Data Collected in Cloud Microservices.

Authors:  Alberto Garcés-Jiménez; Huriviades Calderón-Gómez; José M Gómez-Pulido; Juan A Gómez-Pulido; Miguel Vargas-Lombardo; José L Castillo-Sequera; Miguel Pablo Aguirre; José Sanz-Moreno; María-Luz Polo-Luque; Diego Rodríguez-Puyol
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.