Literature DB >> 24902954

Mortality and translocation assay to study the protective capacity of Bifidobacterium lactis INL1 against Salmonella Typhimurium infection in mice.

M F Zacarías1, J Reinheimer1, L Forzani2, C Grangette3, G Vinderola1.   

Abstract

The mouse has been largely used for the study of the protective capacity of probiotics against intestinal infections caused by Salmonella. In this work we aimed at comparing the mortality and translocation assay for the study of the protective capacity of the human breast milk-derived strain Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis INL1 on a model of gut infection by Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium. Different doses of S. Typhimurium FUNED and B. animalis subsp. lactis INL 1 were administered to Balb/c mice in a mortality or a translocation assay. The survival of the control group in the mortality assay resulted to be variable along experiments, and then we preferred to use a translocation assay where the preventive administration of 109 cfu of bifidobacteria/mouse for 10 consecutive days significantly reduced the number of infected animals and the levels of translocation to liver and spleen, with enhanced secretory immunoglobulin A and interleukin 10 production in the small and large intestine, respectively. Ten days of B. animalis subsp. lactis strain INL1 administration to mice significantly reduced both the incidence and the severity of Salmonella infection in a mouse model of translocation. This work provided the first evidence that a translocation assay, compared to a mortality assay, could be more useful to study the protective capacity of probiotics against Salmonella infection, as more information can be obtained from mice and less suffering is conferred to animals due to the fact that the mortality assay is shorter than the latter. These facts are in line with the guidelines of animal research recently established by the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement & Reduction of Animals in Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Salmonella; bifidobacteria; infection; mouse model; probiotic

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24902954     DOI: 10.3920/BM2013.0086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Benef Microbes        ISSN: 1876-2883            Impact factor:   4.205


  5 in total

Review 1.  Discovering probiotic microorganisms: in vitro, in vivo, genetic and omics approaches.

Authors:  Konstantinos Papadimitriou; Georgia Zoumpopoulou; Benoit Foligné; Voula Alexandraki; Maria Kazou; Bruno Pot; Effie Tsakalidou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SC06 Induces Autophagy to Protect against Pathogens in Macrophages.

Authors:  Yanping Wu; Yang Wang; Hai Zou; Baikui Wang; Qiming Sun; Aikun Fu; Yuanyuan Wang; Yibing Wang; Xiaogang Xu; Weifen Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Spray-drying process preserves the protective capacity of a breast milk-derived Bifidobacterium lactis strain on acute and chronic colitis in mice.

Authors:  Patricia Burns; Jeanne Alard; Jiri Hrdỳ; Denise Boutillier; Roxana Páez; Jorge Reinheimer; Bruno Pot; Gabriel Vinderola; Corinne Grangette
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Variability in gut mucosal secretory IgA in mice along a working day.

Authors:  Patricia Burns; Sofia Oddi; Liliana Forzani; Eduardo Tabacman; Jorge Reinheimer; Gabriel Vinderola
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-02-05

5.  The Probiotic Combination of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis CECT 7210 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BPL6 Reduces Pathogen Loads and Improves Gut Health of Weaned Piglets Orally Challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium.

Authors:  Emili Barba-Vidal; Lorena Castillejos; Victor F B Roll; Gloria Cifuentes-Orjuela; José A Moreno Muñoz; Susana M Martín-Orúe
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.