Jane E Feetham1, Will Christian1, Jonathan R Benger2, Rebecca Hoskins3, David Odd4, Mark D Lyttle5. 1. Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK. 2. Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK Academic Department of Emergency Care, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK. 3. Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK. 4. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK. 5. Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK Academic Department of Emergency Care, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this project is to establish the unplanned reattendance rate for paediatric emergency nurse practitioners (PENPs) working in a designated paediatric emergency department (PED) while identifying the case mix of patients seen by PENPs compared with their medical counterparts. DESIGN: Quantitative data regarding patient characteristics and reattendance were collected during retrospective review of case notes across two representative 2-week periods. SETTING: The study site is a tertiary urban PED with an annual attendance of 32 000 patients aged from birth to 15 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reattendance rates, patient characteristics, triage scores, presenting complaint and numbers of patients discussed with a paediatric emergency medicine consultant were evaluated. RESULTS: The results showed that PENPs have a lower reattendance rate (1.75%) when compared with senior and junior doctors in training (4.29%, 5.76%); however, PENPs treat a different population of children. When the odds of PENP reattendance are adjusted for this, the significance of the difference becomes less certain. CONCLUSIONS: PENPs work autonomously when seeing children presenting with minor trauma and make a positive contribution in achieving the reattendance Clinical Quality Indicator. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this project is to establish the unplanned reattendance rate for paediatric emergency nurse practitioners (PENPs) working in a designated paediatric emergency department (PED) while identifying the case mix of patients seen by PENPs compared with their medical counterparts. DESIGN: Quantitative data regarding patient characteristics and reattendance were collected during retrospective review of case notes across two representative 2-week periods. SETTING: The study site is a tertiary urban PED with an annual attendance of 32 000 patients aged from birth to 15 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reattendance rates, patient characteristics, triage scores, presenting complaint and numbers of patients discussed with a paediatric emergency medicine consultant were evaluated. RESULTS: The results showed that PENPs have a lower reattendance rate (1.75%) when compared with senior and junior doctors in training (4.29%, 5.76%); however, PENPs treat a different population of children. When the odds of PENP reattendance are adjusted for this, the significance of the difference becomes less certain. CONCLUSIONS: PENPs work autonomously when seeing children presenting with minor trauma and make a positive contribution in achieving the reattendance Clinical Quality Indicator. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Emergency Department; Nursing, Practitioners; Paediatrics, Paediatric Emergency Medicine