Literature DB >> 24902624

Distal-selective hydroformylation using scaffolding catalysis.

Candice L Joe1, Thomas P Blaisdell, Allison F Geoghan, Kian L Tan.   

Abstract

In hydroformylation, phosphorus-based directing groups have been consistently successful at placing the aldehyde on the carbon proximal to the directing group. The design and synthesis of a novel catalytic directing group are reported that promotes aldehyde formation on the carbon distal relative to the directing functionality. This scaffolding ligand, which operates through a reversible covalent bond to the substrate, has been applied to the diastereoselective hydroformylation of homoallylic alcohols to afford δ-lactones selectively. Altering the distance between the alcohol and the olefin revealed that homoallylic alcohols gives the distal lactone with the highest levels of regioselectivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24902624      PMCID: PMC4227840          DOI: 10.1021/ja504247g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


The functionalization of carboncarbon double bonds serves as a bedrock for synthetic chemistry. The ease of synthesis, ubiquity, and low cost of olefins makes them ideal building blocks for organic synthesis. A critical challenge in olefin functionalization reactions is the control of regioselectivity. Often reactions have an inherent regio-preference that can be exploited or amplified; however, in these cases, accessing the inherently less favorable product is challenging. Olefins, such as 1,2-disubstituted olefins, pose an alternative problem in that there is often no electronic or steric differentiation of the olefinic carbons; this presents the onerous task of synthesizing either isomer of product selectively. To fully realize the potential of olefin functionalization reactions, our goal is to develop a general strategy that can overcome innate substrate bias and, in the case of unbiased substrates, is able to predictably synthesize either structural isomer of the product. Hydroformylation is a classic example of an olefin functionalization reaction where the control of regioselectivity is the preeminent challenge. The hydroformylation of olefins generally prefers to form the aldehyde on the least hindered carbon.[1] Over the last several decades, branch selective hydroformylation has been developed in the context of enantioselective hydroformylation by exploiting substrates that have an electronic bias to form the more hindered aldehyde.[2] Landis[3] and Zhang[4] have shown that substrates bearing weakly Lewis basic functional groups can produce branched aldehydes with practical levels of regio- and enantioselectivity. In a pioneering report, Clarke reported significant branched and enantioselectivity for unactivated terminal olefins (e.g., 1-hexene) using ligand control.[5] In an alternative strategy, Reek et al. demonstrated control of regio- and enantioselectivity in unactivated disubstituted olefins using supramolecular catalysis.[6] Stoichiometric phosphorus-based directing groups are effective at accessing the branched isomer for terminal alkenes[7] as well as favoring aldehyde formation on the carbon proximal to the directing group for more highly substituted olefins.[8] Improving upon the overall atom efficiency of this strategy, the Breit group[9] and our group[10] reported the first catalytic phosphorus-based directing groups in 2008.[11] Although a reliable strategy, the use of directing groups has been limited to placing the aldehyde in the proximal position relative to the directing functionality.[12] Recently, this deficiency has been partially addressed by using ligands that can hydrogen bond to olefin substrates bearing a carboxylic acid functional group, enabling the aldehyde to be formed on the carbon distal to the directing functionality.[13] Here, we report a novel scaffolding ligand that utilizes reversible covalent bonding to perform distal and diastereoselective hydroformylation of homoallylic alcohols toward the synthesis of δ-lactones (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1

Scaffold Controlled Regioselective Hydroformylation

Combining the design elements from the Breit supramolecular catalyst[13a] and our original azaphosphole ligand (scaffold A),[10a] we targeted a small collection of ligands with the substructure of scaffold B. The critical features for these ligands are an oxazolidine group that our group has previously shown to bind to alcohols[14] and a triaryl phosphine, which serves as the metal binding site. This overall series has a modular synthesis allowing for both the tuning of the steric and electronic properties of the phosphine as well as the positioning of the substrate and metal-binding sites. Determined by 1H NMR of the crude hydroformylation mixture using mesitylene as an internal standard. Regioselectivity (proximal:distal) determined by gas chromatography of the crude reaction mixture after PCC oxidation. Diastereomer ratio (anti:syn) as determined by 1H NMR (CD3OD) of the reaction mixture after PCC oxidation. Reaction run using 0.10 mol % p-TsOH. We initially tested the new ligands in the hydroformylation of homoallylic alcohols bearing an allylic substituent (Table 1). Using PPh3 as a control ligand, a slight preference exists for the formation of the distal product with minimal levels of diastereocontrol and low conversion (Table 1, entry 1); these results highlight the dual challenge of achieving high levels of reactivity and selectivity for disubstituted olefins in hydroformylation. Employing scaffolding ligand 2 (entry 2) results in a significant increase in conversion and regio- and diastereoselectivity. Next, chiral scaffolding ligand 3b, which is derived from l-valine, was synthesized. A matched/mis-matched relationship is observed when employing enantiopure variants of the substrate (entries 3 and 4), with the (R)-isomer being matched. Reducing the size of the substituent on the oxazolidine backbone to a methyl group (entry 5) results in lower conversion and selectivities; however, ligand 3c bearing an oxazolidine backbone derived from l-tert-leucine affords high levels of regio- and diastereoselectivity (entry 6). Ligand 3c is also the most active, giving 92% conversion in the hydroformylation reaction. With the tert-leucine backbone in hand, the electronics on the phosphine were perturbed. Both electron-rich (ligand 3d) and electron-deficient (ligand 3e) phosphines gave inferior results when compared to electron neutral ligand 3c. In particular, both the conversion and diastereoselectivity during the hydroformylation reaction suffered (entries 7 and 8). Using ligand 4, which contains no substrate-binding site, the reaction proceeds sluggishly; moreover, both the regio- and diastereoselectivities are comparable to the results utilizing PPh3 as ligand (entry 9). This demonstrates the importance of the substrate-binding site for both achieving high levels of selectivity and obtaining rate acceleration in the reaction. Employing a catalytic amount of p-TsOH during the reaction afforded nearly identical results (entry 10) but proved to be a necessary additive to obtain reproducible conversions and selectivities.
Table 1

Optimization of Ligand Structure

entrysubstrateligand% convarsb (p:d)drc (a:s)
1rac-1PPh33046:5453:47
2rac-126019:8176:24
3(S)-13b6528:7267:33
4(R)-13b879:9188:12
5(R)-13a5524:7674:26
6(R)-13c929:9187:13
7(R)-13d6314:8684:16
8(R)-13e8810:9085:15
9(R)-144444:5658:42
10d(R)-13c959:9187:13

Determined by 1H NMR of the crude hydroformylation mixture using mesitylene as an internal standard.

Regioselectivity (proximal:distal) determined by gas chromatography of the crude reaction mixture after PCC oxidation.

Diastereomer ratio (anti:syn) as determined by 1H NMR (CD3OD) of the reaction mixture after PCC oxidation.

Reaction run using 0.10 mol % p-TsOH.

The selective formation of the anti diastereomer of the δ-lactone (Table 2, entry 1) is attributed to the minimization of A1,3-strain in the hydrometalation step of the reaction.[15] In support of this hypothesis, the diastereoselectivity is amplified in favor of the anti diastereomer (91:9 dr) when a larger isopropyl substituent is placed in the allylic position (Table 2, entry 2).[16] To further demonstrate the effect of A1,3-strain on diastereoselectivity, an E-configured olefin substrate was examined (Table 2, entry 3). While the δ-lactone is still formed selectively (20:80 rs), the syn-isomer is observed as the major stereoisomer. Notably, the magnitude of diastereoselection for the E-olefin in favor of the syn product (32:68) is lower than that of the corresponding Z-olefin substrate for the formation of the anti isomer (87:13). This result is consistent with decreased A1,3-strain between the respective hydrogen and butyl substituents interacting with the allylic methyl group.
Table 2

Substrate Scope

Regioselectivities (proximal:distal) and diastereomer ratio (anti:syn) were determined by GC or 1H NMR of the crude reaction mixtures after PCC oxidation.

Isolated yield of combined distal lactone products.

(i) 10 mol % 3c, 0.10 mol % p-TsOH, 45 °C, benzene; (ii) 3 mol % Rh(acac)(CO)2, 55 °C, 400 psi H2/CO, benzene; (iii) PCC, NaOAc, 3 Å sieves, DCM.

Standard conditions except 20 mol % 3c and 6 mol % Rh(acac)(CO)2 were used.

Standard conditions except 12 mol % 3c and 4 mol % Rh(acac)(CO)2 were used.

Standard conditions except the hydroformylation was run at 35 °C using 5 mol % 3c and 2 mol % Rh(acac)(CO)2.

Regioselectivities (proximal:distal) and diastereomer ratio (anti:syn) were determined by GC or 1H NMR of the crude reaction mixtures after PCC oxidation. Isolated yield of combined distal lactone products. (i) 10 mol % 3c, 0.10 mol % p-TsOH, 45 °C, benzene; (ii) 3 mol % Rh(acac)(CO)2, 55 °C, 400 psi H2/CO, benzene; (iii) PCC, NaOAc, 3 Å sieves, DCM. Standard conditions except 20 mol % 3c and 6 mol % Rh(acac)(CO)2 were used. Standard conditions except 12 mol % 3c and 4 mol % Rh(acac)(CO)2 were used. Standard conditions except the hydroformylation was run at 35 °C using 5 mol % 3c and 2 mol % Rh(acac)(CO)2. A substrate bearing a phenyl substituent at the allylic position underwent the directed hydroformylation efficiently in high levels of selectivity (entry 4). Various electron-deficient and electron-rich para-substituted (entries 5–7) and meta-substituted (entries 8,9) aromatic substituents were well tolerated and afforded the δ-lactones in a regio- and diastereoeselective fashion. Highlighting the functional group tolerance of the reaction, a substrate bearing a silyl ether substituent at the allylic position gave the anti δ-lactone product in a selective fashion (entry 10).[17] Employing a terminal olefin substrate (entry 11), the inherent regiochemical preference can be amplified, in comparison to a control reaction where PPh3 is used as ligand, to afford the six-membered lactone as the major product.[18] Conversion based on remaining starting material after the hydroformylation reaction using mesitylene as an internal standard. Regioselectivities (proximal:distal) were determined by 1H NMR. Crude hydroformylation reaction was subjected to Pinnick oxidation (see Supporting Information for experimental details). Crude hydroformylation reaction was subjected to PCC oxidation (see Supporting Information for details). No derivatization of the crude hydroformylation reaction was carried out. Results in parentheses run under identical conditions, except PPh3 was used rather than ligand 3c. A critical question for this new ligand class is where the regioselectivity in the hydroformylation reaction originates from. In part, we hypothesize that the preference for the δ-lactone vs the γ-lactone is the formation of a less strained, larger metallacycle during the catalytic cycle. This is analogous to carbocycles that exhibit a significant drop in ring strain moving from 11- to 12-membered rings. To probe this question, we investigated the hydroformylation of allylic, homoallylic, and bis-homoallylic alcohols (Table 3). Allylic alcohols undergo hydroformylation with a slight preference for the proximal product in the presence of ligand 3c, which is similar to the regiochemical preference employing PPh3 as ligand (Table 3, entry 1). Relative to the control reaction with PPh3, homoallylic alcohols show a significant preference for the δ-lactone product (entry 2). Interestingly, under these conditions a low level of enantioselectivity (19% ee) is observed. Decreasing the pressure to 100 psi H2/CO increases the enantioselectivity to 37% ee with similar levels of regioselectivity for the δ-lactone.[19] Notably, the reaction with PPh3 is sluggish (40% conversion), which highlights the rate accelerating affect in the presence of ligand 3c. Minimal levels of regiocontrol for the distal product are observed in the case of a bis-homoallylic alcohol substrate (entry 3), but enhanced conversion is observed. These results are most consistent with a directed reaction that is nonselective, but an undirected reaction cannot be ruled out at this time. Overall these results demonstrate that the regiochemical outcome of the reaction is highly dependent on the appropriate choice of tether length between the olefin and the phosphine on the ligand. This is in contrast to proximal selective directing groups, which generally are more promiscuous with respect to substrate class.
Table 3

Importance of Substrate Tether

Conversion based on remaining starting material after the hydroformylation reaction using mesitylene as an internal standard.

Regioselectivities (proximal:distal) were determined by 1H NMR.

Crude hydroformylation reaction was subjected to Pinnick oxidation (see Supporting Information for experimental details).

Crude hydroformylation reaction was subjected to PCC oxidation (see Supporting Information for details).

No derivatization of the crude hydroformylation reaction was carried out.

Results in parentheses run under identical conditions, except PPh3 was used rather than ligand 3c.

In the context of hydroformylation of 1,2-disubstituted olefins, the challenge of directing to the carbon distal to the directing group has gone relatively unaddressed. We have developed a highly tunable catalytic directing group, which can carry out the distal and diastereoselective hydroformylation of homoallylic alcohols. Together with previous examples of proximal-selective hydroformylation, these results begin to more fully address the challenge of generally controlling regioselectivity in olefin functionalization reactions.
  35 in total

1.  GPC and ESI-MS analysis of labeled poly(1-hexene): rapid determination of initiated site counts during catalytic alkene polymerization reactions.

Authors:  Beth M Moscato; Bolin Zhu; Clark R Landis
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  The catalytic intermolecular orthoarylation of phenols.

Authors:  Robin B Bedford; Simon J Coles; Michael B Hursthouse; Michael E Limmert
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2003-01-03       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Formation of quaternary carbon centers by highly regioselective hydroformylation with catalytic amounts of a reversibly bound directing group.

Authors:  Yusuke Ueki; Hideto Ito; Ippei Usui; Bernhard Breit
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 5.236

4.  Remote control of regio- and diastereoselectivity in the hydroformylation of bishomoallylic alcohols with catalytic amounts of a reversibly bound directing group.

Authors:  Christian U Grünanger; Bernhard Breit
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Scaffolding catalysts: highly enantioselective desymmetrization reactions.

Authors:  Xixi Sun; Amanda D Worthy; Kian L Tan
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Application of a chiral scaffolding ligand in catalytic enantioselective hydroformylation.

Authors:  Amanda D Worthy; Candice L Joe; Thomas E Lightburn; Kian L Tan
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Enantioselective hydroformylation of N-vinyl carboxamides, allyl carbamates, and allyl ethers using chiral diazaphospholane ligands.

Authors:  Richard I McDonald; Gene W Wong; Ram P Neupane; Shannon S Stahl; Clark R Landis
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Site-selective catalysis: toward a regiodivergent resolution of 1,2-diols.

Authors:  Amanda D Worthy; Xixi Sun; Kian L Tan
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Directed regio- and stereoselective hydroformylation of mono- and 1,3-disubstituted allylic alcohols: a catalytic approach to the anti-aldol-retron.

Authors:  Bernhard Breit; Peter Demel; Antje Gebert
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  Catalyst recognition of cis-1,2-diols enables site-selective functionalization of complex molecules.

Authors:  Xixi Sun; Hyelee Lee; Sunggi Lee; Kian L Tan
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 24.427

View more
  5 in total

1.  α-Tetrasubstituted Aldehydes through Electronic and Strain-Controlled Branch-Selective Stereoselective Hydroformylation.

Authors:  Josephine Eshon; Floriana Foarta; Clark R Landis; Jennifer M Schomaker
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.354

Review 2.  Supramolecular Approaches To Control Activity and Selectivity in Hydroformylation Catalysis.

Authors:  Sandra S Nurttila; Pim R Linnebank; Tetiana Krachko; Joost N H Reek
Journal:  ACS Catal       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 13.084

3.  Silicon-oriented regio- and enantioselective rhodium-catalyzed hydroformylation.

Authors:  Cai You; Xiuxiu Li; Yuhong Yang; Yu-Sheng Yang; Xuefeng Tan; Shuailong Li; Biao Wei; Hui Lv; Lung-Wa Chung; Xumu Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Nickel(0)-catalyzed linear-selective hydroarylation of unactivated alkenes and styrenes with aryl boronic acids.

Authors:  Honggui Lv; Li-Jun Xiao; Dongbing Zhao; Qi-Lin Zhou
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 9.825

5.  Total Synthesis of Mycinolide IV and Path-Scouting for Aldgamycin N.

Authors:  Bart Herlé; Georg Späth; Lucas Schreyer; Alois Fürstner
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 15.336

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.