Literature DB >> 24902590

The influence of the design matrix on treatment effect estimates in the quantitative analyses of single-subject experimental design research.

Mariola Moeyaert1, Maaike Ugille2, John M Ferron3, S Natasha Beretvas4, Wim Van den Noortgate2.   

Abstract

The quantitative methods for analyzing single-subject experimental data have expanded during the last decade, including the use of regression models to statistically analyze the data, but still a lot of questions remain. One question is how to specify predictors in a regression model to account for the specifics of the design and estimate the effect size of interest. These quantitative effect sizes are used in retrospective analyses and allow synthesis of single-subject experimental study results which is informative for evidence-based decision making, research and theory building, and policy discussions. We discuss different design matrices that can be used for the most common single-subject experimental designs (SSEDs), namely, the multiple-baseline designs, reversal designs, and alternating treatment designs, and provide empirical illustrations. The purpose of this article is to guide single-subject experimental data analysts interested in analyzing and meta-analyzing SSED data.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Keywords:  alternating treatment design; design matrix; multiple-baseline design; piecewise regression equation; reversal design; single-subject experimental design

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24902590     DOI: 10.1177/0145445514535243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Modif        ISSN: 0145-4455


  6 in total

1.  Statistical analysis in Small-N Designs: using linear mixed-effects modeling for evaluating intervention effectiveness.

Authors:  Robert W Wiley; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.773

2.  Quantitative Techniques and Graphical Representations for Interpreting Results from Alternating Treatment Design.

Authors:  Rumen Manolov; René Tanious; Patrick Onghena
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-05-13

3.  A Priori Justification for Effect Measures in Single-Case Experimental Designs.

Authors:  Rumen Manolov; Mariola Moeyaert; Joelle E Fingerhut
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-03-25

4.  The Power to Explain Variability in Intervention Effectiveness in Single-Case Research Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling.

Authors:  Mariola Moeyaert; Panpan Yang; Xinyun Xu
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-09-01

5.  Causal Mediation Analysis in Single Case Experimental Designs: Introduction to the Special Issue.

Authors:  Milica Miočević; Mariola Moeyaert; Axel Mayer; Amanda K Montoya
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Analyzing Two-Phase Single-Case Data with Non-overlap and Mean Difference Indices: Illustration, Software Tools, and Alternatives.

Authors:  Rumen Manolov; José L Losada; Salvador Chacón-Moscoso; Susana Sanduvete-Chaves
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.