| Literature DB >> 24902590 |
Mariola Moeyaert1, Maaike Ugille2, John M Ferron3, S Natasha Beretvas4, Wim Van den Noortgate2.
Abstract
The quantitative methods for analyzing single-subject experimental data have expanded during the last decade, including the use of regression models to statistically analyze the data, but still a lot of questions remain. One question is how to specify predictors in a regression model to account for the specifics of the design and estimate the effect size of interest. These quantitative effect sizes are used in retrospective analyses and allow synthesis of single-subject experimental study results which is informative for evidence-based decision making, research and theory building, and policy discussions. We discuss different design matrices that can be used for the most common single-subject experimental designs (SSEDs), namely, the multiple-baseline designs, reversal designs, and alternating treatment designs, and provide empirical illustrations. The purpose of this article is to guide single-subject experimental data analysts interested in analyzing and meta-analyzing SSED data.Keywords: alternating treatment design; design matrix; multiple-baseline design; piecewise regression equation; reversal design; single-subject experimental design
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24902590 DOI: 10.1177/0145445514535243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Modif ISSN: 0145-4455