| Literature DB >> 24902519 |
W Wujcicka1, Z Gaj, J Wilczyński, W Sobala, E Spiewak, D Nowakowska.
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to perform an evaluation of the prevalence and socioeconomic risk factors for human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infections in a cohort of Polish pregnant women between 2010 and 2011. HCMV-specific IgG and IgM antibody levels were assayed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests in serum samples collected from 1,250 pregnant women attending outpatient obstetric clinics and hospitalized at two hospitals in Lodz. The seroprevalence of anti-HCMV IgG and IgM antibodies was 62.4 and 2.2 %, respectively, and differed significantly between age-stratified groups (p ≤ 0.05). The highest IgG prevalence was observed in women above 36 years of age (76.2 %) and IgM in adolescent women aged 16-20 years (6.0 %). Of the various socioeconomic factors, age above 36 years, basic and professional education, and offspring were significantly associated with HCMV IgG prevalence rates (PRs; 1.89, 1.80, and 1.56, respectively). Financial status, occupational risk related to contact with children, and transfusions were not related to the prevalence of IgG antibodies. The IgM prevalence was not associated with any of the analyzed risk factors. A slightly higher prevalence was observed in women who were transfused in the past, but the relationship was not significant. The current data have revealed a decrease in HCMV IgG seroprevalence in our region during recent years (62.4 vs. 76.7 %). Basic and professional education, as well as bringing up offspring, were determined as significant risk factors for HCMV infections in Polish pregnant women [risk ratio (RR) 1.20 and 1.17, respectively], suggesting that the primary and secondary prophylaxis of cytomegaly is necessary during pregnancy, even if screening is not mandatory.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24902519 PMCID: PMC4555441 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-014-2170-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ISSN: 0934-9723 Impact factor: 3.267
Risk factors for human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) IgG prevalence in different socioeconomic groups of pregnant women
| Risk factors | Classes | No. tested (%) | HCMV IgG positive (%) | χ2 |
| PR | 95 % CI |
| RR | 95 % CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 1,250 (100 %) | 780 (62.4 %) | |||||||||
| Age | ≤20 | 50 (4.0 %) | 33 (66.0 %) | 14.13 | 0.0069 | 1.00 | 0.51–1.98 | 0.9917 | 1.01 | 0.80–1.29 | 0.0910 |
| 21–25 | 199 (15.9 %) | 122 (61.3 %) | 1.00 | 0.69–1.46 | 0.9986 | 1.01 | 0.88–1.16 | ||||
| 26–30 | 509 (40.7 %) | 298 (58.5 %) | 1.0 | 1.0 | Ref. | ||||||
| 31–35 | 362 (29.0 %) | 228 (63.0 %) | 0.99 | 0.73–1.33 | 0.9235 | 1.00 | 0.90–1.22 | ||||
| ≥36 | 130 (10.4 %) | 99 (76.2 %) | 1.89 | 1.17–3.07 | 0.0095 | 1.20 | 1.06–1.36 | ||||
| Education | Higher | 667 (56.5 %) | 387 (58.0 %) | 12.72 | 0.0017 | 1.0 | 1.0 | Ref. | 0.0276 | ||
| Secondary | 369 (31.3 %) | 238 (64.5 %) | 1.34 | 1.00–1.79 | 0.0496 | 1.10 | 0.99–1.22 | ||||
| Primary and vocational | 144 (12.2 %) | 105 (72.9 %) | 1.80 | 1.14–2.83 | 0.0116 | 1.20 | 1.05–1.37 | ||||
| Having children | No | 691 (59.1 %) | 396 (57.3 %) | 17.45b | ≤0.0001 | 1.0 | 1.0 | Ref. | 0.0016 | ||
| Yes | 479 (40.9 %) | 333 (69.5 %) | 1.56 | 1.19–2.05 | 0.0012 | 1.17 | 1.06–1.29 | ||||
| Financial status | Bad | 48 (3.8 %) | 28 (58.3 %) | 3.28 | 0.5115 | Not calculatedc | 1.0 | Ref. | 0.3469 | ||
| Average | 359 (28.7 %) | 228 (63.5 %) | – | 1.10 | 0.87–1.40 | ||||||
| Good | 616 (49.3 %) | 391 (63.5 %) | – | 1.09 | 0.85–1.38 | ||||||
| Very good | 76 (6.1 %) | 41 (53.9 %) | – | 0.94 | 0.68–1.29 | ||||||
| Unknown | 151 (12.1 %) | 92 (60.9 %) | – | 0.95 | 0.71–1.28 | ||||||
| Risk of occupational contact with children | No | 799 (63.3 %) | 491 (61.5 %) | 1.45 | 0.4843 | – | 1.0 | Ref. | 0.6520 | ||
| Yes | 373 (29.8 %) | 236 (63.3 %) | Not calculatedc | 1.02 | 0.93–1.12 | ||||||
| Unknown | 78 (6.2 %) | 53 (67.9 %) | – | 1.21 | 0.85–1.72 | ||||||
| Transfusions | No | 1,134 (96.1 %) | 707 (62.3 %) | 0.64 | 0.4247 | 1.0 | 1.0 | Ref. | 0.2004 | ||
| Yes | 46 (3.9 %) | 26 (56.5 %) | 0.56 | 0.30–1.06 | 0.0747 | 0.85 | 0.67–1.09 | ||||
No. tested number of tested pregnant women, Ref. reference class, PR prevalence ratio, 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval, RR risk ratio
a p ≤ 0.05 is considered as significant
bPearson’s Chi-squared test with Yates’ continuity correction
cNot calculated since RR was assessed as a more adequate index
HCMV IgM prevalence and risk factors in the studied cohort of pregnant women
| Risk factors | Classes | HCMV IgM positive (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 28 (2.2 %) | |
| Age | ≤20 | 3 (6.0 %) |
| 21–25 | 4 (2.0 %) | |
| 26–30 | 5 (1.0 %) | |
| 31–35 | 10 (2.8 %) | |
| ≥36 | 6 (4.6 %) | |
| Education | Higher | 14 (2.1 %) |
| Secondary | 7 (1.9 %) | |
| Primary and vocational | 3 (2.1 %) | |
| Having children | No | 15 (2.2 %) |
| Yes | 10 (2.1 %) | |
| Financial status | Bad | 1 (2.1 %) |
| Average | 5 (1.4 %) | |
| Good | 16 (2.6 %) | |
| Very good | 2 (2.6 %) | |
| Unknown | 4 (2.6 %) | |
| Risk of occupational contact with children | No | 16 (2.0 %) |
| Yes | 9 (2.4 %) | |
| Transfusions | No | 23 (2.0 %) |
| Yes | 2 (4.3 %) |