Literature DB >> 24902498

Psychometric properties and validation of the Italian version of the Mainz pain staging system as a tool for pain-patients referral selection.

Boaz G Samolsky Dekel1, Alberto Gori, Alessio Vasarri, Marco Adversi, GianFranco Di Nino, Rita M Melotti.   

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: Indications are lacking on which patient to refer to pain facilities. Pain-chronicity stage and outcome prognosis may be used for such aims. The Mainz pain-staging system (MPSS) classifies pain patients in three chronicity stages that respectively require more extensive management. We explored the psychometric and validation properties of its Italian version towards its application as screening/referral tool.
METHODS: I-MPSS was administered to n=120 mixed non-cancer-pain outpatients. Psychometric analyses and formal validation included: content validity, by assessing the hypothesis of an existing relationship between the I-MPSS classes and criteria derived from an operational case definition of chronic pain; construct validity, by principle component analysis (PCA); the autonomous construct of the I-MPSS was assessed by the strength of the Spearman correlation between its classes and the brief pain inventory (BPI) items; and reliability, by applying Cronbach's alpha statistics. Associations between psychosocial moderators and the I-MPSS were assessed applying χ(2) analyses.
RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative analyses showed significant differences between I-MPSS classes for health care and drug utilization; BPI item scores significantly differed between the classes; Spearman correlation between I-MPSS classes and BPI items was mostly moderate or mild. PCA and scree test identified four components accounting for 63.7% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha was 0.842.
CONCLUSIONS: The I-MPSS showed satisfactory psychometric and validation properties. With adequate feasibility, it enabled the screening of mixed non-cancer-pain outpatients in three chronicity/prognostic stages. Results are sufficient to warrant its use for a subsequent impact study as a prognostic model and screening tool for referring pain patients.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MPSS; construct validity; content validity; factorial validity; internal consistency; psychometric validation; stratified medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24902498     DOI: 10.1111/jep.12185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  3 in total

1.  Lasting Prolonged-Release Tapentadol for Moderate/Severe Non-Cancer Musculoskeletal Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Boaz G Samolsky Dekel; Sivia Ghedini; Alberto Gori; Alessio Vasarri; GianFranco Di Nino; Rita M Melotti
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2015-01-06

2.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the German Pain Solutions Questionnaire: an instrument to measure assimilative and accommodative coping in response to chronic pain.

Authors:  Robert Sielski; Julia Anna Glombiewski; Winfried Rief; Geert Crombez; Antonia Barke
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.133

3.  Triage processes at multidisciplinary chronic pain clinics: An international review of current procedures.

Authors:  M Gabrielle Pagé; Daniel Ziemianski; Yoram Shir
Journal:  Can J Pain       Date:  2017-10-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.