Literature DB >> 24901874

Efficacy of a Short Plate With an Oblique Screw Trajectory for Anterior Cervical Plating: A Comparative Study With a 2-Year Minimum Follow-Up.

Jong-Hwa Park1, Seung-Jae Hyun, Chang-Hyun Lee, Ki-Jeong Kim, Jin S Yeom, Tae-Ahn Jahng, Hyun-Jib Kim.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study. BACKGROUND CONTEXT: It has been reported that adjacent segment ossification development (ASOD) commonly occurs after anterior cervical arthrodesis.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the short plate and oblique screw trajectory with the traditional long plate and parallel screw trajectory by investigating the incidence of ASOD and graft subsidence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the patients who underwent single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with plate augmentation in our institute between June 2003 and August 2011. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the plating technique, which was determined by the distances between the tips of the plate and the cranial and caudal adjacent endplates (plate-to-endplate distance, PED). Group L included the patients with a long plate (PED shorter than 5 mm), and group S contained the patients with a short plate (PED longer than 5 mm). Vertebral body height, distribution of ACDF level, incidence of cranial and caudal ASOD, ASOD grade, screw-to-endplate angle, vertebral body diameter, screw length, screw-to-body ratio, disk space height, subsidence, and cervical range of motion were measured and compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: The incidences of both cranial and caudal ASOD at least 2 years after surgery in group S were significantly lower than in group L (17.6% vs. 53.8%, P=0.001 and 31.4% vs. 65.4%, P=0.004, respectively). The incidence of severe ASOD at the caudal adjacent disk space was significantly lower in group S (2.0% vs. 23.0%, P=0.002). The incidence of the subsidence was significantly lower in group S (2.0% vs. 25.9, P=0.001). Changes in the cervical range of motion showed no significant differences regardless of group, ASOD, and graft subsidence.
CONCLUSIONS: Techniques using a short plate with an oblique screw trajectory resulted in significantly reduced incidence and severity of ASOD and prevented graft subsidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 24901874     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  5 in total

Review 1.  Locking stand-alone cage versus anterior plate construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yachao Zhao; Sidong Yang; Yachong Huo; Zhaohui Li; Dalong Yang; Wenyuan Ding
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Efficiency of minimal oblique resection of the uncinate process during an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Byoung Hun Lee; Jong Hwa Park; Jong Young Lee; Hong Jun Jeon; Seung-Woo Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Comparison between selective caudal fixed screw construct and all variable screw construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Jae Jun Yang; Sehan Park; Seongyun Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Radiologic Findings and Risk Factors of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion : A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study with 3-Year Follow-Up Using MRI.

Authors:  Sang-Soak Ahn; Wan-Soo So; Min-Geun Ku; Sang-Hyeon Kim; Dong-Won Kim; Byung-Hun Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-02-29

Review 5.  Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Zero-P System for Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhaoyang Guo; Xiaolin Wu; Shuai Yang; Chang Liu; Youfu Zhu; Nana Shen; Zhu Guo; Weiliang Su; Yan Wang; Bohua Chen; Hongfei Xiang
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.037

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.