OBJECTIVES:Women-initiated HIV-prevention products are urgently needed. To address this need, a trial was conducted to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of a silicone elastomer matrix vaginal ring containing 25 mg of the antiretroviral drug dapivirine when used continuously for 28 consecutive days. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 16 healthy, HIV-negative women, 18-40 years of age, who were randomized 1:1 to use either the active or matching placebo ring for 28 days. Participants were followed during and for 28 days after ring use for safety and pharmacokinetic evaluations. RESULTS: The dapivirine vaginal ring was safe and well tolerated with no differences in safety endpoints between the active and placebo ring. The concentration-time plots of dapivirine in vaginal fluid were indicative of a sustained release of dapivirine over the 28 days of use. Dapivirine vaginal fluid concentrations were highest near the ring, followed by the cervix and introïtus (mean Cmax of 80, 67 and 31 μg/g, respectively). Vaginal fluid concentrations of dapivirine on the day of ring removal (day 28) at all three collection sites exceeded by more than 3900-fold the IC99 for dapivirine in a tissue explant infection model. Plasma dapivirine concentrations were low (< 1 ng/ml) and remained well below those observed at the maximum tolerated dose for oral treatment (mean Cmax of 2286 ng/ml). CONCLUSION: The dapivirine vaginal ring has a safety and pharmacokinetic profile that supports its use as a sustained-release topical microbicide for HIV-1 prevention in women.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES:Women-initiated HIV-prevention products are urgently needed. To address this need, a trial was conducted to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of a silicone elastomer matrix vaginal ring containing 25 mg of the antiretroviral drug dapivirine when used continuously for 28 consecutive days. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 16 healthy, HIV-negative women, 18-40 years of age, who were randomized 1:1 to use either the active or matching placebo ring for 28 days. Participants were followed during and for 28 days after ring use for safety and pharmacokinetic evaluations. RESULTS: The dapivirine vaginal ring was safe and well tolerated with no differences in safety endpoints between the active and placebo ring. The concentration-time plots of dapivirine in vaginal fluid were indicative of a sustained release of dapivirine over the 28 days of use. Dapivirine vaginal fluid concentrations were highest near the ring, followed by the cervix and introïtus (mean Cmax of 80, 67 and 31 μg/g, respectively). Vaginal fluid concentrations of dapivirine on the day of ring removal (day 28) at all three collection sites exceeded by more than 3900-fold the IC99 for dapivirine in a tissue explant infection model. Plasma dapivirine concentrations were low (< 1 ng/ml) and remained well below those observed at the maximum tolerated dose for oral treatment (mean Cmax of 2286 ng/ml). CONCLUSION: The dapivirine vaginal ring has a safety and pharmacokinetic profile that supports its use as a sustained-release topical microbicide for HIV-1 prevention in women.
Authors: Jared M Baeten; Thesla Palanee-Phillips; Elizabeth R Brown; Katie Schwartz; Lydia E Soto-Torres; Vaneshree Govender; Nyaradzo M Mgodi; Flavia Matovu Kiweewa; Gonasagrie Nair; Felix Mhlanga; Samantha Siva; Linda-Gail Bekker; Nitesha Jeenarain; Zakir Gaffoor; Francis Martinson; Bonus Makanani; Arendevi Pather; Logashvari Naidoo; Marla Husnik; Barbra A Richardson; Urvi M Parikh; John W Mellors; Mark A Marzinke; Craig W Hendrix; Ariane van der Straten; Gita Ramjee; Zvavahera M Chirenje; Clemensia Nakabiito; Taha E Taha; Judith Jones; Ashley Mayo; Rachel Scheckter; Jennifer Berthiaume; Edward Livant; Cindy Jacobson; Patrick Ndase; Rhonda White; Karen Patterson; Donna Germuga; Beth Galaska; Katherine Bunge; Devika Singh; Daniel W Szydlo; Elizabeth T Montgomery; Barbara S Mensch; Kristine Torjesen; Cynthia I Grossman; Nahida Chakhtoura; Annalene Nel; Zeda Rosenberg; Ian McGowan; Sharon Hillier Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kerri J Penrose; Carole L Wallis; Chanson J Brumme; Kristen A Hamanishi; Kelley C Gordon; Raquel V Viana; P Richard Harrigan; John W Mellors; Urvi M Parikh Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ariane van der Straten; Erica N Browne; Mary Kate Shapley-Quinn; Elizabeth R Brown; Krishnaveni Reddy; Rachel Scheckter; Lydia Soto-Torres; Thesla Palanee-Phillips; Jared M Baeten; Barbara Mensch Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: John W McBride; Nicola Dias; David Cameron; Robin E Offord; Oliver Hartley; Peter Boyd; Vicky L Kett; R Karl Malcolm Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Marla J Husnik; Elizabeth R Brown; Mark Marzinke; Edward Livant; Thesla Palanee-Phillips; Craig W Hendrix; Flavia Matovu Kiweewa; Gonasagrie Nair; Lydia E Soto-Torres; Katie Schwartz; Sharon L Hillier; Jared M Baeten Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Beatrice A Chen; Jingyang Zhang; Holly M Gundacker; Craig W Hendrix; Craig J Hoesley; Robert A Salata; Charlene S Dezzutti; Ariane van der Straten; Wayne B Hall; Cindy E Jacobson; Sherri Johnson; Ian McGowan; Annalene M Nel; Lydia Soto-Torres; Mark A Marzinke Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-03-19 Impact factor: 9.079