Literature DB >> 24899681

Rearing in a distorted magnetic field disrupts the 'map sense' of juvenile steelhead trout.

Nathan F Putman1, Amanda M Meinke2, David L G Noakes3.   

Abstract

We used simulated magnetic displacements to test orientation preferences of juvenile steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) exposed to magnetic fields existing at the northernmost and southernmost boundaries of their oceanic range. Fish reared in natural magnetic conditions distinguished between these two fields by orienting in opposite directions, with headings that would lead fish towards marine foraging grounds. However, fish reared in a spatially distorted magnetic field failed to distinguish between the experimental fields and were randomly oriented. The non-uniform field in which fish were reared is probably typical of fields that many hatchery fish encounter due to magnetic distortions associated with the infrastructure of aquaculture. Given that the reduced navigational abilities we observed could negatively influence marine survival, homing ability and hatchery efficiency, we recommend further study on the implications of rearing salmonids in unnatural magnetic fields.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  magnetic map; navigation; salmon; trout

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24899681      PMCID: PMC4090542          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  9 in total

1.  Migrating songbirds recalibrate their magnetic compass daily from twilight cues.

Authors:  William W Cochran; Henrik Mouritsen; Martin Wikelski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Magnetic maps in animals: nature's GPS.

Authors:  Kenneth J Lohmann; Catherine M F Lohmann; Nathan F Putman
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research.

Authors:  Ran Nathan; Wayne M Getz; Eloy Revilla; Marcel Holyoak; Ronen Kadmon; David Saltz; Peter E Smouse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Compatibility of magnetic imprinting and secular variation.

Authors:  Nathan F Putman; Kenneth J Lohmann
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  An inherited magnetic map guides ocean navigation in juvenile Pacific salmon.

Authors:  Nathan F Putman; Michelle M Scanlan; Eric J Billman; Joseph P O'Neil; Ryan B Couture; Thomas P Quinn; Kenneth J Lohmann; David L G Noakes
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Behavioral titration of a magnetic map coordinate.

Authors:  John B Phillips; Michael J Freake; Janette H Fischer; ChrisS Borland
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-02-23       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  The magnetic map of hatchling loggerhead sea turtles.

Authors:  Kenneth J Lohmann; Nathan F Putman; Catherine M F Lohmann
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Longitude perception and bicoordinate magnetic maps in sea turtles.

Authors:  Nathan F Putman; Courtney S Endres; Catherine M F Lohmann; Kenneth J Lohmann
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  DETECTION OF MAGNETIC INCLINATION ANGLE BY SEA TURTLES: A POSSIBLE MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING LATITUDE

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.312

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Migration behaviour of commercial monarchs reared outdoors and wild-derived monarchs reared indoors.

Authors:  Ayşe Tenger-Trolander; Marcus R Kronforst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Near absence of differential gene expression in the retina of rainbow trout after exposure to a magnetic pulse: implications for magnetoreception.

Authors:  Robert R Fitak; Lorian E Schweikert; Benjamin R Wheeler; David A Ernst; Kenneth J Lohmann; Sönke Johnsen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Geomagnetic imprinting predicts spatio-temporal variation in homing migration of pink and sockeye salmon.

Authors:  Nathan F Putman; Erica S Jenkins; Catherine G J Michielsens; David L G Noakes
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Magnetic map in nonanadromous Atlantic salmon.

Authors:  Michelle M Scanlan; Nathan F Putman; Amanda M Pollock; David L G Noakes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Anadromy, potamodromy and residency in brown trout Salmo trutta: the role of genes and the environment.

Authors:  Andrew Ferguson; Thomas E Reed; Tom F Cross; Philip McGinnity; Paulo A Prodöhl
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.051

Review 6.  Magnetic maps in animal navigation.

Authors:  Kenneth J Lohmann; Kayla M Goforth; Alayna G Mackiewicz; Dana S Lim; Catherine M F Lohmann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 7.123

8.  Variability in Migration Routes Influences Early Marine Survival of Juvenile Salmon Smolts.

Authors:  Nathan B Furey; Stephen P Vincent; Scott G Hinch; David W Welch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Drifting with Flow versus Self-Migrating-How Do Young Anadromous Fish Move to the Sea?

Authors:  Zhenli Huang
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2019-08-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.